Skip to content

Conversation

chenhengqi
Copy link
Contributor

The current implementation seems incorrect and does NOT match the comment above, use bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize() instead.

Fixes: 1dad391 ("bpf, arm64: use bpf_prog_pack for memory management")

The current implementation seems incorrect and does NOT match the
comment above, use bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize() instead.

Fixes: 1dad391 ("bpf, arm64: use bpf_prog_pack for memory management")
Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <[email protected]>
@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot force-pushed the bpf-next_base branch 8 times, most recently from 17f7415 to a9f9e99 Compare September 2, 2025 15:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant