-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
annual report for wg-batch 2024 #8287
annual report for wg-batch 2024 #8287
Conversation
/hold Holding for wg-batch reviews. /assign @mwielgus @swatisehgal @soltysh |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for this updates!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @kannon92, for your efforts on this!
This is just a nice-to-have if you have the time, as it’s not part of the template: Would it make sense to capture some ongoing key items and/or plans for 2025?
Just an example (as we recently discussed this): Ongoing work on topology-aware scheduling tools like Sakkara and Topograph.
I lean no as it may become quite dated. I wanted this to focus on what wg-batch did in 2024 so its easier to show the work done. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor nits, but overall lgtm
/approve
/hold
for others to review
/assign @aojea |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for doing this @kannon92! It's a great year for the Batch WG 🎉
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome!
/lgtm
Thanks @kannon92 |
@andreyvelich: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
LGTM |
/hold cancel wow, impressive work, happy to see this energy and vibrant community thriving in 2025 too Congrats |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: aojea, kannon92, soltysh The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #8277