Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

annual report for wg-batch 2024 #8287

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 20, 2025

Conversation

kannon92
Copy link
Contributor

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #8277

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 17, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the area/annual-reports Issues or PRs related to the annual reports label Jan 17, 2025
@kannon92 kannon92 mentioned this pull request Jan 17, 2025
6 tasks
@kannon92
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold

Holding for wg-batch reviews.

/assign @mwielgus @swatisehgal @soltysh

/cc @mimowo @tenzen-y

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 17, 2025
Copy link
Member

@tenzen-y tenzen-y left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for this updates!

Copy link
Contributor

@swatisehgal swatisehgal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @kannon92, for your efforts on this!

This is just a nice-to-have if you have the time, as it’s not part of the template: Would it make sense to capture some ongoing key items and/or plans for 2025?

Just an example (as we recently discussed this): Ongoing work on topology-aware scheduling tools like Sakkara and Topograph.

@kannon92
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is just a nice-to-have if you have the time, as it’s not part of the template: Would it make sense to capture some ongoing key items and/or plans for 2025?

I lean no as it may become quite dated. I wanted this to focus on what wg-batch did in 2024 so its easier to show the work done.

Copy link
Contributor

@soltysh soltysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor nits, but overall lgtm

/approve
/hold
for others to review

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 30, 2025
@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor

soltysh commented Jan 30, 2025

/assign @aojea
as steering liaison

Copy link

@andreyvelich andreyvelich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for doing this @kannon92! It's a great year for the Batch WG 🎉

Copy link
Member

@tenzen-y tenzen-y left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Thanks!

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 11, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 11, 2025
Copy link
Member

@tenzen-y tenzen-y left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome!
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 11, 2025
@andreyvelich
Copy link

Thanks @kannon92
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@andreyvelich: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

In response to this:

Thanks @kannon92
/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@mimowo
Copy link
Contributor

mimowo commented Feb 12, 2025

LGTM
Thanks!

@aojea
Copy link
Member

aojea commented Feb 20, 2025

/hold cancel
/lgtm
/approve

wow, impressive work, happy to see this energy and vibrant community thriving in 2025 too

Congrats

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 20, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: aojea, kannon92, soltysh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit ac49e23 into kubernetes:master Feb 20, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/annual-reports Issues or PRs related to the annual reports cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2024 Annual Report: WG Batch
9 participants