Skip to content

Conversation

agusdallalba
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it:

The --update-status functionality is extremely useful in "stretched", bare metal, and minimalistic k8s deployments, because it lets us do simple DNS load balancing in conjunction with external_dns or k8s_gateway with no single points of failure.

What updateStatus does is set ingress.status.loadBalancer.ingress.ip[] to the address of every node that's running the ingress-nginx controller.

However, in dual stack clusters (or any clusters where nodes have more than 1 IP address) updateStatus picks only the first address of each node. So we end up with a single-stack Ingress even though the node is reachable on both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.

This PR addresses this limitation and makes the controller publish every appropriate address of the node to the Ingress status.

I took care to preserve the previous behaviour where:

  • When --report-node-internal-ip-address is true, only internal addresses are pushed to the Ingress status.
  • When --report-node-internal-ip-address is false, only external addresses are pushed to the Ingress status, unless,
  • When --report-node-internal-ip-address is false, and the node has 0 external addresses, internal addresses are picked instead.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • CVE Report (Scanner found CVE and adding report)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation only

How Has This Been Tested?

I added more tests, ran make test, make build, make image, and pushed to a cluster to try it out and confirm that it works as I expect it to.

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I've read the CONTRIBUTION guide
  • I have added unit and/or e2e tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Oct 15, 2025

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • ✅ login: agusdallalba / name: Agustín Dall'Alba (ff9c214)
  • ✅ login: Gacko / name: Marco Ebert (08f3880)

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 15, 2025

Deploy Preview for kubernetes-ingress-nginx canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 08f3880
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/kubernetes-ingress-nginx/deploys/68f74283ce33380008f5ae02

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Oct 15, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from Gacko October 15, 2025 16:43
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. label Oct 15, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @agusdallalba!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/ingress-nginx 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/ingress-nginx has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. labels Oct 15, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @agusdallalba. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-priority size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 15, 2025
@agusdallalba agusdallalba force-pushed the main branch 2 times, most recently from bbc1686 to 74d4629 Compare October 16, 2025 13:39
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Oct 16, 2025
Copy link
Member

@Gacko Gacko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/retitle Status: Add support for multiple Node IP addresses.
/triage accepted
/kind feature
/priority backlog
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot changed the title Add support for multiple Node IP addresses (e.g. dual stack) to updateStatus Status: Add support for multiple Node IP addresses. Oct 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. and removed needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Oct 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. and removed needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority labels Oct 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 21, 2025
@Gacko
Copy link
Member

Gacko commented Oct 21, 2025

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: agusdallalba, Gacko

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 6917c48 into kubernetes:main Oct 21, 2025
27 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants