Skip to content

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Sep 4, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
actions/setup-go action major v3 -> v6

Release Notes

actions/setup-go (actions/setup-go)

v6

Compare Source

v5

Compare Source

v4

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to 4b1c155 in 45 seconds. Click for details.
  • Reviewed 178 lines of code in 4 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 4 draft comments. View those below.
  • Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. .github/workflows/main.yml:31
  • Draft comment:
    Updated actions/setup-go from v3 to v6. Ensure that the 'go-version' parameter and its usage remain compatible with v6. Also, double-check the release notes for any breaking changes in v6 that might affect your workflow.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% The comment is asking the PR author to ensure compatibility and check for breaking changes, which violates the rule against asking the author to confirm or double-check things. It also relates to dependency changes, which should not be commented on unless there's a specific suggestion or issue identified.
2. .github/workflows/prerelease.yml:32
  • Draft comment:
    The actions/setup-go version was bumped to v6. Verify that the v6 behavior (especially parameter handling) aligns with your needs and that there are no side effects from the major version upgrade.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% This comment is asking the PR author to verify the behavior of a dependency version change, which is against the rules. It doesn't provide a specific suggestion or point out a specific issue with the code.
3. .github/workflows/release.yml:29
  • Draft comment:
    Changed actions/setup-go@v3 to v6. Confirm that any changes introduced in v6 (if any) — such as parameter defaults or new options — do not adversely affect the release process.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% This comment is asking the PR author to confirm changes related to a dependency update, which violates the rule against commenting on dependency changes or asking for confirmation of intentions. The comment does not provide a specific code suggestion or ask for a specific test to be written.
4. .github/workflows/run-acceptance-tests.yml:35
  • Draft comment:
    Updated actions/setup-go from v3 to v6. Make sure that the specified 'go-version' input is correctly interpreted under v6 and that there are no unexpected behavioral changes in your acceptance tests workflow.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% This comment is asking the PR author to ensure that the 'go-version' input is correctly interpreted and that there are no unexpected behavioral changes. This falls under asking the author to double-check things and ensure behavior, which violates the rules.

Workflow ID: wflow_ln6yCujHfiUJj7ly

You can customize Ellipsis by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant