Skip to content

Reworked pillars#305

Open
someaddons wants to merge 1 commit intoversion/latestfrom
pillars
Open

Reworked pillars#305
someaddons wants to merge 1 commit intoversion/latestfrom
pillars

Conversation

@someaddons
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@someaddons someaddons commented Sep 22, 2025

Adjusted the pillars to be more in minecrafts blocky style
The previously blocky pillar now is a tougher square intended for carrying heavy structural loads
The previously round pillar now is a small square for places where a not as havey pillar fits better

image (middle of the picture is the existing square)

blocky now is a tougher square
round now is a small square
@marchermans
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I would suggest to leave the old shapes
And just add the new ones.

Should not be too difficult?

@Shadizar
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Shadizar commented Oct 7, 2025

Oh no
I use a lot of these throughout my whole style
is there any way to add things and not remove old ones? This will require a major effort to rework many many buildings

@Shadizar
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Shadizar commented Oct 7, 2025

I'm begging
please don't remove any of the existing things

@Figure404
Copy link
Copy Markdown

The argument of "more minecraft look" is moot with all of the other non minecraft blocks, this will just alienate alot of builders that like the round pillars and ruin alot of looks.
Please add them but not change them.

@rainweaver76
Copy link
Copy Markdown

I would agree that adding the skinnier pillar as a new option would be great, but the existing pillars are really pretty and heavily used in many styles and should stay.

@AnyankaT
Copy link
Copy Markdown

AnyankaT commented Oct 7, 2025

I agree - it would break too many styles to remove the round pillars. Seems a shame to remove any of the DO block types. Adding additional types makes sense - removing existing ones does not.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants