-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 296
http: Removes section about http paths #636
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
We have a multiaddr for `/http-path` so the section is now irrelevant
| - [Context](#context) | ||
| - [What is an HTTP transport](#what-is-an-http-transport) | ||
| - [Multiaddr representation](#multiaddr-representation) | ||
| - [HTTP Paths (and other HTTP Semantics)](#http-paths-and-other-http-semantics) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This TOC line needs removing since the corresponding section has been removed, or you can regenerate it using Markdown All in One or similar.
|
|
||
| ## HTTP Paths (and other HTTP Semantics) | ||
|
|
||
| It may be tempting to add an HTTP path to end of the multiaddr to specify some |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess this means we do have paths in HTTP Multiaddrs now? Is it worth adding an example of their use?
| ### Recommendation on including HTTP semantics in multiaddrs | ||
| ### Recommendation on including HTTP Request semantics in Multiaddrs | ||
|
|
||
| In general, it's better to keep the multiaddrs as a way of addressing an |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lowercase is fine? It's lowercase everywhere.
| you may end up with many Multiaddrs with different transports but the same | ||
| suffix. A potential solution here is to keep them separate. A list of Multiaddrs | ||
| for the transports being used, and another Multiaddr for the application-level | ||
| data. This is one suggestion, and many other strategies would work as well. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have them now.