Skip to content

Conversation

@hombit
Copy link
Member

@hombit hombit commented Nov 26, 2025

No description provided.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Nov 26, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #591 will degrade performances by 37.52%

Comparing release-v0.10.5 (29f21dc) with master (f1fe651)

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

Summary

⚡ 49 improvements
❌ 11 regressions
✅ 46 untouched
⏩ 106 skipped1

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Change
WallTime test_benchmark_naive 2.3 ms 2 ms +16.64%
WallTime test_benchmark_rust 1.9 µs 3.1 µs -37.52%
WallTime test_benchmark_lc_py 451.1 µs 408.3 µs +10.49%
WallTime test_benchmark_naive 432.2 µs 389.4 µs +11%
WallTime test_benchmark_naive 2.1 ms 1.6 ms +29.15%
WallTime test_benchmark_naive 2.1 ms 1.6 ms +29.18%
WallTime test_benchmark_lc_py 35.5 µs 30.6 µs +16.03%
WallTime test_benchmark_naive 25.4 µs 22.6 µs +12.11%
WallTime test_benchmark_rust 2.3 µs 2.6 µs -10.73%
WallTime test_benchmark_lc_py 49 µs 40.3 µs +21.64%
WallTime test_benchmark_rust 3.6 µs 4.8 µs -25.39%
WallTime test_benchmark_lc_py 30.5 µs 25.3 µs +20.6%
WallTime test_benchmark_naive 20.4 µs 18.1 µs +12.2%
WallTime test_benchmark_rust 3 µs 3.4 µs -13.1%
WallTime test_benchmark_lc_py 34.6 µs 28.4 µs +21.94%
WallTime test_benchmark_naive 23.5 µs 21.2 µs +11.21%
WallTime test_benchmark_lc_py 38.7 µs 32.2 µs +20.27%
WallTime test_benchmark_naive 25.2 µs 22.2 µs +13.61%
WallTime test_benchmark_lc_py 54.2 µs 47.8 µs +13.32%
WallTime test_benchmark_lc_py 130.2 µs 153.8 µs -15.37%
... ... ... ... ... ...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

Footnotes

  1. 106 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 26, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 82.61%. Comparing base (f1fe651) to head (29f21dc).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #591   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.61%   82.61%           
=======================================
  Files           9        9           
  Lines        2605     2605           
=======================================
  Hits         2152     2152           
  Misses        453      453           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@hombit hombit merged commit d412a28 into master Nov 26, 2025
82 of 83 checks passed
@hombit hombit deleted the release-v0.10.5 branch November 26, 2025 20:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants