Skip to content

Conversation

@tankyleo
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@ldk-reviews-bot
Copy link

ldk-reviews-bot commented Oct 29, 2025

👋 Thanks for assigning @TheBlueMatt as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 29, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.87%. Comparing base (afb80e5) to head (426c881).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4187      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.86%   88.87%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         180      180              
  Lines      137869   137863       -6     
  Branches   137869   137863       -6     
==========================================
+ Hits       122520   122531      +11     
+ Misses      12539    12523      -16     
+ Partials     2810     2809       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzing 20.85% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
tests 88.72% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt added this to the 0.2 milestone Oct 29, 2025
/// is set) or `static_remote_key` channel.
///
/// To have confidence that a force-close transaction will reach miners and get confirmed,
/// zero-fee commitment channels require your Bitcoin node **and some of its peers** to
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Might be worth being explicit that there needs to be a path between your node and miners running 29+.

@tankyleo tankyleo force-pushed the 25-10-0FC-requires-v29 branch from 13a5269 to 30e3bdc Compare October 29, 2025 21:17
@tankyleo tankyleo requested a review from TheBlueMatt October 29, 2025 21:18
@tankyleo tankyleo force-pushed the 25-10-0FC-requires-v29 branch from 30e3bdc to 426c881 Compare October 29, 2025 21:21
Copy link
Collaborator

@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks

@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt merged commit dcad93c into lightningdevkit:main Oct 29, 2025
21 of 23 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

@carlaKC carlaKC left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

post-merge ack

@TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Collaborator

Backported to 0.2 in #4193

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants