Conversation
|
Previous Discussion: #375 |
|
@suyashtava thanks for the PR, have your observed the memory consumption increase with this approach? |
@mhratson There is a small increase in memory. I don't have any comparison data ready at the moment since we changed this months ago in production. GIve me a day I will reproduce the comparison data on the Weekend. |
|
@mhratson With the existing opensource KMF: It is taking avg 73 MB of Memory, wherease with Parallel Producer(PR): It is taking avg 85 MB of memory. CPU Usage almost remains untouched. FYI: We are using java.lang.Memory.HeapMemoryUsage.usedBytes for memory calculation. |
|
Have you considered using using async |
Issue. #395
This PR aims to provide parallel Producer per partition, so that even if one partition is slow(hosted on slow Brtoker) other producers can easily produce data on other partitions.