Improve image replication test region; Add LA notice #582
Conversation
yec-akamai
requested review from
lgarber-akamai and
ykim-1
and removed request for
a team
| regions, err := client.ListRegions(context.Background(), nil) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| t.Fatal(err) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| regionHasCaps := func(r linodego.Region) bool { | ||
| capsMap := make(map[string]bool) | ||
|
|
||
| for _, c := range r.Capabilities { | ||
| capsMap[strings.ToUpper(c)] = true | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| for _, c := range capabilities { | ||
| if _, ok := capsMap[strings.ToUpper(c)]; !ok { | ||
| return false | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return true | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
optional: Would it make sense to call getRegionsWithCaps(...) here and filter down the results below?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I did try to call getRegionsWithCaps(...) at first but figured out it might be better to have the logic here. Because getRegionsWithCaps(...) only return a list of region's id string, we will have to make extra API calls to get the Region object for obtaining necessary info. It's probably slow down the test.
I'm wondering if it makes sense to move regionHasCaps(...) as an independent function, so that we can call it here without repeating this part of logic. What's your thoughts?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think that would be a good idea. Maybe we can move it as a separate helper function in integration_test_suite.go
📝 Description
Improve the image replication test case and remove the hardcoded regions.
Add LA notice to image gen2 endpoint.
✔️ How to Test