[CIR][Lowering][Bugfix] lower ScopeOp with return op #364
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
lanza
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2024
`ScopeOp` may end with `ReturnOp` instead of `YieldOp`, that is not
expected now. This PR fix this.
The reduced example is:
```
int foo() {
{
return 0;
}
}
```
This is quite frequent bug in `llvm-test-suite`
lanza
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 23, 2024
`ScopeOp` may end with `ReturnOp` instead of `YieldOp`, that is not
expected now. This PR fix this.
The reduced example is:
```
int foo() {
{
return 0;
}
}
```
This is quite frequent bug in `llvm-test-suite`
eZWALT
pushed a commit
to eZWALT/clangir
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 24, 2024
`ScopeOp` may end with `ReturnOp` instead of `YieldOp`, that is not
expected now. This PR fix this.
The reduced example is:
```
int foo() {
{
return 0;
}
}
```
This is quite frequent bug in `llvm-test-suite`
eZWALT
pushed a commit
to eZWALT/clangir
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 24, 2024
`ScopeOp` may end with `ReturnOp` instead of `YieldOp`, that is not
expected now. This PR fix this.
The reduced example is:
```
int foo() {
{
return 0;
}
}
```
This is quite frequent bug in `llvm-test-suite`
lanza
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2024
`ScopeOp` may end with `ReturnOp` instead of `YieldOp`, that is not
expected now. This PR fix this.
The reduced example is:
```
int foo() {
{
return 0;
}
}
```
This is quite frequent bug in `llvm-test-suite`
lanza
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2024
`ScopeOp` may end with `ReturnOp` instead of `YieldOp`, that is not
expected now. This PR fix this.
The reduced example is:
```
int foo() {
{
return 0;
}
}
```
This is quite frequent bug in `llvm-test-suite`
eZWALT
pushed a commit
to eZWALT/clangir
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2024
`ScopeOp` may end with `ReturnOp` instead of `YieldOp`, that is not
expected now. This PR fix this.
The reduced example is:
```
int foo() {
{
return 0;
}
}
```
This is quite frequent bug in `llvm-test-suite`
lanza
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2024
`ScopeOp` may end with `ReturnOp` instead of `YieldOp`, that is not
expected now. This PR fix this.
The reduced example is:
```
int foo() {
{
return 0;
}
}
```
This is quite frequent bug in `llvm-test-suite`
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
ScopeOpmay end withReturnOpinstead ofYieldOp, that is not expected now. This PR fix this.The reduced example is:
This is quite frequent bug in
llvm-test-suite