Skip to content

[clang-format] Don't annotate enum colon as InheritanceColon #138440

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

owenca
Copy link
Contributor

@owenca owenca commented May 4, 2025

Fix #61156

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented May 4, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format

Author: Owen Pan (owenca)

Changes

Fix #61156


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138440.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp (+1-1)
  • (modified) clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp (+9-3)
diff --git a/clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp b/clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp
index caf386cffd25b..e549c98179d3e 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp
@@ -1423,7 +1423,7 @@ class AnnotatingParser {
         Tok->setType(TT_BitFieldColon);
       } else if (Contexts.size() == 1 &&
                  !Line.First->isOneOf(tok::kw_enum, tok::kw_case,
-                                      tok::kw_default)) {
+                                      tok::kw_default, tok::kw_typedef)) {
         FormatToken *Prev = Tok->getPreviousNonComment();
         if (!Prev)
           break;
diff --git a/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp b/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp
index 0fb64ceec5c97..af54716783f54 100644
--- a/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp
+++ b/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp
@@ -3666,7 +3666,7 @@ TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, BraceKind) {
                     getGoogleStyle(FormatStyle::LK_JavaScript));
   ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 12u) << Tokens;
   EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[3], tok::identifier, TT_ClassHeadName);
-  EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[4], tok::identifier, TT_Unknown); // Not TT_StartOfName
+  EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[4], tok::identifier, TT_Unknown); // Not TT_StartOfName.
   EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[8], tok::l_brace, TT_ClassLBrace);
   EXPECT_BRACE_KIND(Tokens[8], BK_Block);
   EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[9], tok::r_brace, TT_ClassRBrace);
@@ -3833,7 +3833,7 @@ TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, CppOnlyKeywordInC) {
   ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 8u) << Tokens;
   EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[3], tok::identifier, TT_Unknown); // Not tok::kw_new
   EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[4], tok::amp, TT_BinaryOperator);
-  EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[3], tok::identifier, TT_Unknown); // Not TT_StartOfName
+  EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[3], tok::identifier, TT_Unknown); // Not TT_StartOfName.
 }
 
 TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, FunctionTryBlock) {
@@ -3947,7 +3947,7 @@ TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, VariableTemplate) {
   EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[4], tok::identifier, TT_VariableTemplate);
   EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[5], tok::less, TT_TemplateOpener);
   EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[7], tok::greater, TT_TemplateCloser);
-  EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[8], tok::r_paren, TT_Unknown); // Not TT_CastRParen
+  EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[8], tok::r_paren, TT_Unknown); // Not TT_CastRParen.
   EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[9], tok::plus, TT_BinaryOperator);
 }
 
@@ -4033,6 +4033,12 @@ TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, UserDefinedLiteral) {
   EXPECT_EQ(Tokens[3]->TokenText, "2_$");
 }
 
+TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, EnumColonInTypedef) {
+  auto Tokens = annotate("typedef enum : int {} foo;");
+  ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 9u) << Tokens;
+  EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[2], tok::colon, TT_Unknown); // Not TT_InheritanceColon.
+}
+
 } // namespace
 } // namespace format
 } // namespace clang

@@ -1423,7 +1423,7 @@ class AnnotatingParser {
Tok->setType(TT_BitFieldColon);
} else if (Contexts.size() == 1 &&
!Line.First->isOneOf(tok::kw_enum, tok::kw_case,
tok::kw_default)) {
tok::kw_default, tok::kw_typedef)) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sadly typedef class is a thing too, this would break, wouldn't it?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[clang-format] There is no option to disable BreakInheritanceList and BreakConstructorInitializers
3 participants