GH#14152: tighten research.md (113→106 lines)

[alex-solovyev]

Summary

• Renamed ## Structured Questions → ## Required Questions to clarify semantics (always-asked vs pick-2 probes)
• Compacted Sufficiency Test from 8 lines to 1 line — all 4 checklist items preserved inline (time box, deliverable format, ranked decision criteria, who decides)
• Zero content loss: all 7 code blocks, all numbered options, all default assumptions unchanged

Runtime Testing

• Risk level: Low (docs/agent prompts only)
• Verification: self-assessed — markdownlint clean, content preservation verified via diff

Closes #14152

---

aidevops.sh v3.5.456 plugin for OpenCode v1.3.7 with claude-opus-4-6 spent 2m and 5,347 tokens on this with the user in an interactive session. Overall, 19m since this issue was created.

[gemini-code-assist]

Warning

You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again!

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@alex-solovyev has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 29 minutes and 14 seconds before requesting another review.

Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 29 minutes and 14 seconds.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 61c9a800-91b3-4c6a-84e3-f0b765a664eb

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 682981e and 8863a45.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .agents/reference/define-probes/research.md

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch chore/GH-14152-tighten-research-probes

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[github-actions]

🔍 Code Quality Report

�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report

SonarCloud: 0 bugs, 0 vulnerabilities, 1 code smells

Mon Mar 30 12:35:01 UTC 2026: Code review monitoring started
Mon Mar 30 12:35:01 UTC 2026: SonarCloud - Bugs: 0, Vulnerabilities: 0, Code Smells: 1

📈 Current Quality Metrics

• BUGS: 0
• CODE SMELLS: 1
• VULNERABILITIES: 0

Generated on: Mon Mar 30 12:35:04 UTC 2026

---

Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[alex-solovyev]

What was done

• Renamed ## Structured Questions → ## Required Questions — clarifies semantics (always-asked vs pick-2 probes)
• Compacted Sufficiency Test from 8 lines → 1 line, preserving all 4 checklist items inline
• 113 → 106 lines (7 lines, ~6% reduction)

Testing Evidence

• Level required: self-assessed (docs/agent prompts — low risk)
• markdownlint: 0 errors
• Content preservation verified via git diff — all 7 code blocks, all numbered options, all default assumptions unchanged

Key Decisions

• Kept code fences around probe text — consistent with all other define-probes files (feature, bugfix, refactor, docs)
• Modest reduction because the file was already well-structured — most content is functional code blocks, not prose

Files Changed

• .agents/reference/define-probes/research.md — section rename + sufficiency test compaction

Blockers

• Merge blocked by branch protection requiring 1 approving review

Follow-up

• None

Closes #14152

---

aidevops.sh v3.5.456 plugin for OpenCode v1.3.7 with claude-opus-4-6 spent 5m and 7,288 tokens on this with the user in an interactive session. Solved in 22m.