Conversation
…aining the features to the template and add proper formatting Signed-off-by: MTRNord <MTRNord@users.noreply.github.com>
MTRNord
added
ecosystem
| {% elif feature_name == "sso" %} | ||
| Legacy SSO | ||
| {% elif feature_name == "oidc" %} | ||
| OIDC |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
TIL its named OAuth2 in spec... Yet everyone talking about it calls oidc...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"OIDC native" turned out to marketing speech (admittedly it rolls off the tongue a bit easier, e.g. https://areweoidcyet.com/), but concessions have been made in the meantime.
| - voip_jitsi: Jitsi-based group calls | ||
| - threads: Threading support | ||
| - sso: Legacy Single Sign-On (m.login.sso) | ||
| - oidc: Native OIDC/OAuth 2.0 authentication (Matrix Authentication Service, added in spec 1.15) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
not sure about namedropping MAS since that's just an implementation. link to spec if clarification necessary?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Well it is the one thing most people seem to know it by. I agree with linking to spec though. But I feel like most people will still confuse it with the legacy sso :/ I guess we will find out.
| @@ -1,3 +1,45 @@ | |||
| {# Client macros for the Matrix.org website Features Schema (all boolean values): | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| {# Client macros for the Matrix.org website Features Schema (all boolean values): | |
| {# Client macros for the matrix.org website Features Schema (all boolean values): |
| @@ -1,3 +1,45 @@ | |||
| {# Client macros for the Matrix.org website Features Schema (all boolean values): | |||
| - e2ee: End-to-end encryption support | |||
| - spaces: Matrix Spaces support | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
what counts as "support" though?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Unclear. This existed before with unclear definition :/
|
I added #3186 to the list of issues resolved by this PR which technically it does. Yet we still need to add the OIDC flag to existing clients that support it. Are you planning this in this PR? Otherwise we need a followup task. |
I would prefer to focus on the technical "framework" here first and add the new features in a new PR so that we dont block on the maintainer feedback loop |
2 participants
Description
Related issues
Resolves #3196, #3186
Role
Website WG :)
Timeline
whenever
Signoff
see Commits :)