Skip to content

Conversation

@wxtim
Copy link
Contributor

@wxtim wxtim commented Nov 5, 2025

Update tutorials after cylc/cylc-flow#7044, changing rainfall data source to Amazon.

N.b. cylc/cylc-flow#7044 and subsequently the update tutorials Workflow will be required prior to this passing automated tests.

To test locally cp -r ~/cylc-flow/cylc/flow/etc/tutorial/cylc-forecast-workflow ~/rose/metomi/rose/etc/tutorial/rose-suite-tutorial and follow the tutorials at https://metomi.github.io/rose/doc/html/tutorial/rose/suites.html#rose-suite-configurations.

@wxtim wxtim added this to the 2.6.x milestone Nov 5, 2025
@wxtim wxtim requested a review from oliver-sanders November 5, 2025 14:39
@wxtim wxtim self-assigned this Nov 5, 2025
@wxtim wxtim added doc dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file infrastructure GH Actions, Codecov etc. labels Nov 5, 2025
@oliver-sanders
Copy link
Member

oliver-sanders commented Nov 5, 2025

Does the Rose tutorial now require the new HDF library thinggy?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We wave goodbye to that storm from 2017 👋


``cylc review`` replaces the Rose Bush utility. It is a Cylc 7
command that can view Cylc 7 and Cylc 8 workflows.
.. note:: Manually starting Cylc Review
Copy link
Contributor Author

@wxtim wxtim Nov 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rose-bush's rebrand was 7 Years ago! cylc/cylc-flow#2614

@wxtim
Copy link
Contributor Author

wxtim commented Nov 6, 2025

Does the Rose tutorial now require the new HDF library thinggy?

Unclear - the only tutorial involving this new data which is ever going to work without Cylc/Cylc-Rose being installed is the rose task-run -O test tutorial, and that uses the data after it has been extracted to CSV.

I think that there is an implicit assumption that cylc-flow[tutorial] has been installed. Is there a reason that we haven't made this assumption explicit? Is there a risk of creating circular dependencies?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file doc infrastructure GH Actions, Codecov etc.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants