Merge subtree update for toolchain nightly-2025-04-01 #312
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Unclear why this needs to be done manually and is not done by the existing Trusty patches.
It also now demonstrates how to avoid memory leaks.
* Give example of how to get the offset of an unsized tail field (prompted by discussion <rust-lang#133055 (comment)>). * Specify the return type. * Add section headings. * Reduce “Visibility is respected…”, to a single sentence.
Interface This commit does not patch libc, stdarch, or cc
…cottmcm Reduce formatting `width` and `precision` to 16 bits This is part of rust-lang#99012 This is reduces the `width` and `precision` fields in format strings to 16 bits. They are currently full `usize`s, but it's a bit nonsensical that we need to support the case where someone wants to pad their value to eighteen quintillion spaces and/or have eighteen quintillion digits of precision. By reducing these fields to 16 bit, we can reduce `FormattingOptions` to 64 bits (see rust-lang#136974) and improve the in memory representation of `format_args!()`. (See additional context below.) This also fixes a bug where the width or precision is silently truncated when cross-compiling to a target with a smaller `usize`. By reducing the width and precision fields to the minimum guaranteed size of `usize`, 16 bits, this bug is eliminated. This is a breaking change, but affects almost no existing code. --- Details of this change: There are three ways to set a width or precision today: 1. Directly a formatting string, e.g. `println!("{a:1234}")` 2. Indirectly in a formatting string, e.g. `println!("{a:width$}", width=1234)` 3. Through the unstable `FormattingOptions::width` method. This PR: - Adds a compiler error for 1. (`println!("{a:9999999}")` no longer compiles and gives a clear error.) - Adds a runtime check for 2. (`println!("{a:width$}, width=9999999)` will panic.) - Changes the signatures of the (unstable) `FormattingOptions::[get_]width` methods to use a `u16` instead. --- Additional context for improving `FormattingOptions` and `fmt::Arguments`: All the formatting flags and options are currently: - The `+` flag (1 bit) - The `-` flag (1 bit) - The `#` flag (1 bit) - The `0` flag (1 bit) - The `x?` flag (1 bit) - The `X?` flag (1 bit) - The alignment (2 bits) - The fill character (21 bits) - Whether a width is specified (1 bit) - Whether a precision is specified (1 bit) - If used, the width (a full usize) - If used, the precision (a full usize) Everything except the last two can simply fit in a `u32` (those add up to 31 bits in total). If we can accept a max width and precision of u16::MAX, we can make a `FormattingOptions` that is exactly 64 bits in size; the same size as a thin reference on most platforms. If, additionally, we also limit the number of formatting arguments, we can also reduce the size of `fmt::Arguments` (that is, of a `format_args!()` expression).
Support for `wasm32-wali-linux-musl` Tier-3 target Adding a new target -- `wasm32-wali-linux-musl` -- to the compiler can target the [WebAssembly Linux Interface](https://github.com/arjunr2/WALI) according to MCP rust-lang/compiler-team#797 Preliminary support involves minimal changes, primarily * A new target spec for `wasm32_wali_linux_musl` that bridges linux options with supported wasm options. Right now, since there is no canonical Linux ABI for Wasm, we use `wali` in the vendor field, but this can be migrated in future version. * Dependency patches to the following crates are required and these crates can be updated to bring target support: - **stdarch** rust-lang/stdarch#1702 - **libc** rust-lang/libc#4244 - **cc** rust-lang/cc-rs#1373 * Minimal additions for FFI support cc `@tgross35` for libc-related changes Tier-3 policy: > A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target. (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.) I will take responsibility for maintaining this target as well as issues > Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important even for a tier 3 target. The target name is consistent with naming patterns from currently supported targets for arch (wasm32), OS, (linux) and env (musl) > Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to disambiguate it. No naming confusion is introduced. > If possible, use only letters, numbers, dashes and underscores for the name. Periods (.) are known to cause issues in Cargo. Compliant > Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for Rust developers or users. It's fully open source > The target must not introduce license incompatibilities. Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust license (MIT OR Apache-2.0). Noted > The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding new license exceptions (as specified by the tidy tool in the rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be subject to any new license requirements. Compliant > Compiling, linking, and emitting functional binaries, libraries, or other code for the target (whether hosted on the target itself or cross-compiling from another target) must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries. Host tools built for the target itself may depend on the ordinary runtime libraries supplied by the platform and commonly used by other applications built for the target, but those libraries must not be required for code generation for the target; cross-compilation to the target must not require such libraries at all. For instance, rustc built for the target may depend on a common proprietary C runtime library or console output library, but must not depend on a proprietary code generation library or code optimization library. Rust's license permits such combinations, but the Rust project has no interest in maintaining such combinations within the scope of Rust itself, even at tier 3. All tools are open-source > "onerous" here is an intentionally subjective term. At a minimum, "onerous" legal/licensing terms include but are not limited to: non-disclosure requirements, non-compete requirements, contributor license agreements (CLAs) or equivalent, "non-commercial"/"research-only"/etc terms, requirements conditional on the employer or employment of any particular Rust developers, revocable terms, any requirements that create liability for the Rust project or its developers or users, or any requirements that adversely affect the livelihood or prospects of the Rust project or its developers or users. No terms present > Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise participate in discussions. This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements. I am not a reviewer > Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries as possible and appropriate (core for most targets, alloc for targets that can support dynamic memory allocation, std for targets with an operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3 target not implementing those portions. This target supports the full standard library with appropriate configuration stubs where necessary (however, similar to all existing wasm32 targets, it excludes dynamic linking or hardware-specific features) > The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target supports running binaries, or running tests (even if they do not pass), the documentation must explain how to run such binaries or tests for the target, using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary. Preliminary documentation is provided at https://github.com/arjunr2/WALI. Further detailed docs (if necessary) can be added once this PR lands > Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular, do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or notifications (via any medium, including via `@)` to a PR author or others involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into such messages. Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested such notifications. Understood > Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2 or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3 target. In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets, such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target. To the best of my knowledge, it does not break any existing target in the ecosystem -- only minimal configuration-specific additions were made to support the target. > Tier 3 targets must be able to produce assembly using at least one of rustc's supported backends from any host target. (Having support in a fork of the backend is not sufficient, it must be upstream.) We can upstream LLVM target support
Signed-off-by: xizheyin <[email protected]>
The LLVM issue [1] was fixed with [2], which is included in the LLVM20 upgrade. Tests no longer fail, so enable them here. [1]: llvm/llvm-project#98681 [2]: llvm/llvm-project#98681
Clarify iterator by_ref docs fixes rust-lang#95143
…kingjubilee [AIX] Fix hangs during testing Fixes all current test hangs experienced during CI runs. 1. ipv6 link-local (the loopback device) gets assigned an automatic zone id of 1, causing the assert to fail and hang in `library/std/src/net/udp/tests.rs` 2. Const alloc does not fail gracefully 3. Debuginfo test has problem with gdb auto load safe path
Due to a reorganization in the `libc` crate, the `xous` target broke with version `0.2.170`. Bump libc to `0.2.171` to fix nightly. Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <[email protected]>
This improves the useability of heaps for priority-based work queues. In certain scenarios, modifications on the most relevant or critical items are performed until a condition that determines the work items have been sufficiently addressed. The loop will repeatedly access the most critical item and put it back in a sorted position when it is complete. Crucially, due to the ordering invariant we know that all work was performed when the completed item remains the most critical. Getting this information from the heap position avoids a (potentially more costly) check on the item state itself. A customized `drop` with boolean result would avoid up to two more comparisons performed in both the last no-op refresh and Drop code but this occurs once in each execution of the above scenario whereas refresh occurs any number of times. Also note that the comparison overhead of Drop is only taken if the element is mutably inspected to determine the end condition, i.e. not when refresh itself is the break condition.
…ze, r=alexcrichton wasm: increase default thread stack size to 1 MB The default stack size for the [main thread is 1 MB as specified by linker options](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/38cf49dde8a5b0b284bb6dffd423d223c9f8f7a3/compiler/rustc_target/src/spec/base/wasm.rs#L14). However, the default stack size for threads was only 64 kB. This is surprisingly small and thus we increase it to 1 MB to match the main thread.
…, r=ibraheemdev Change the syntax of the internal `weak!` macro Change the syntax to include parameter names and a trailing semicolon. Motivation: - Mirror the `syscall!` macro. - Allow rustfmt to format it (when wrapped in parentheses, and when not inside `cfg_if!`). - For better documentation (having the parameter names available in the source code is a bit nicer). - Allow a future improvement to this macro where we can sometimes use the symbol directly when it's statically known to be available (and thus need the parameter names to be available), see rust-lang#136868. r? libs
Add more tests for pin!(). This adds the tests suggested by `@danielhenrymantilla` in this comment: rust-lang#138717 (comment) by
…nieu Implement `alloc::sync::UniqueArc` This implements the `alloc::sync::UniqueArc` part of rust-lang#112566.
stabilize const_cell
``@rust-lang/libs-api`` ``@rust-lang/wg-const-eval`` I see no reason to wait any longer, so I propose we stabilize the use of `Cell` in `const fn` -- specifically the APIs listed here:
```rust
// core::cell
impl<T> Cell<T> {
pub const fn replace(&self, val: T) -> T;
}
impl<T: Copy> Cell<T> {
pub const fn get(&self) -> T;
}
impl<T: ?Sized> Cell<T> {
pub const fn get_mut(&mut self) -> &mut T;
pub const fn from_mut(t: &mut T) -> &Cell<T>;
}
impl<T> Cell<[T]> {
pub const fn as_slice_of_cells(&self) -> &[Cell<T>];
}
```
Unfortunately, `set` cannot be made `const fn` yet as it drops the old contents.
Fixes rust-lang#131283
…boet Start using `with_native_path` in `std::sys::fs` Ideally, each platform should use their own native path type internally. This will, for example, allow passing a `CStr` directly to `std::fs::File::open` and therefore avoid the need for allocating a new null-terminated C string. However, doing that for every function and platform all at once makes for a large PR that is way too prone to breaking. So this PR does some minimal refactoring which should help progress towards that goal. The changes are Unix-only and even then I avoided functions that require more changes so that this PR is just moving things around. r? joboet
std: deduplicate `errno` accesses By marking `__errno_location` as `#[ffi_const]` and `std::sys::os::errno` as `#[inline]`, this PR allows merging multiple calls to `io::Error::last_os_error()` into one.
…iaskrgr Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#137928 (stabilize const_cell) - rust-lang#138431 (Fix `uclibc` LLVM target triples) - rust-lang#138832 (Start using `with_native_path` in `std::sys::fs`) - rust-lang#139081 (std: deduplicate `errno` accesses) - rust-lang#139100 (compiletest: Support matching diagnostics on lines below) - rust-lang#139105 (`BackendRepr::is_signed`: comment why this may panics) - rust-lang#139106 (Mark .pp files as Rust) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Instead of calling new(), we can just use a struct expression directly.
Before:
Placeholder::new(…, …, …, …)
After:
Placeholder {
position: …,
flags: …,
width: …,
precision: …,
}
…ark-Simulacrum
Simplify expansion for format_args!().
Instead of calling `Placeholder::new()`, we can just use a struct expression directly.
Before:
```rust
Placeholder::new(…, …, …, …)
```
After:
```rust
Placeholder {
position: …,
flags: …,
width: …,
precision: …,
}
```
(I originally avoided the struct expression, because `Placeholder` had a lot of fields. But now that rust-lang#136974 is merged, it only has four fields left.)
This will make the `fmt` argument to `fmt::Arguments::new_v1_formatted()` a candidate for const promotion, which is important if we ever hope to tackle rust-lang#92698 (It doesn't change anything yet though, because the `args` argument to `fmt::Arguments::new_v1_formatted()` is not const-promotable.)
Switch some rustc_on_unimplemented uses to diagnostic::on_unimplemented The use on the SliceIndex impl appears unreachable, there is no mention of "vector indices" in any test output and I could not get it to show up in error messages.
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#139044 (bootstrap: Avoid cloning `change-id` list) - rust-lang#139111 (Properly document FakeReads) - rust-lang#139122 (Remove attribute `#[rustc_error]`) - rust-lang#139132 (Improve hir_pretty for struct expressions.) - rust-lang#139141 (Switch some rustc_on_unimplemented uses to diagnostic::on_unimplemented) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Remove mention of `exhaustive_patterns` from `never` docs
The example shows an exhaustive match:
```rust
#![feature(exhaustive_patterns)]
use std::str::FromStr;
let Ok(s) = String::from_str("hello");
```
But rust-lang#119612 moved this functionality to `#
tautschnig
approved these changes
Apr 4, 2025
carolynzech
approved these changes
Apr 7, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is an automated PR to merge library subtree updates from 2025-03-18 (rust-lang/rust@43a2e9d) to 2025-04-01 (rust-lang/rust@0b45675) (inclusive) into main.
git mergeresulted in conflicts, which require manual resolution. Files were commited with merge conflict markers. Do not remove or edit the following annotations:git-subtree-dir: library
git-subtree-split: c60865a