output new ServerID after publishing #359
Merged
+25
−9
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rdimitrov
reviewed
Sep 5, 2025
domdomegg
reviewed
Sep 5, 2025
rdimitrov
reviewed
Sep 6, 2025
rdimitrov
reviewed
Sep 6, 2025
|
This would also address - #401 |
|
@slimslenderslacks - hey, Jim, there are some conflicts with the latest main, can you rebase your changes? Thanks! 👍 |
slimslenderslacks
force-pushed
the
slim/server-id
branch
from
bfb8b1a to
21d566b
Compare
|
@rdimitrov I just rebased. |
rdimitrov
approved these changes
Sep 10, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When using
mcp-publisher publish ..., output the new serverIDif publishing is successful.Motivation and Context
It's useful to know this during testing. It means that you don't have to go and search for the new server ID afterwards. Once we have the
v0/servers/{name}/{version}, I think we could consider removing this again.How Has This Been Tested?
I've been using this while I test publishing to locally running registries.
Breaking Changes
none
Types of changes
Checklist