🐛 Fix SSA Dominance Issues for Mapping Pass for Circuits With Barriers#1581
Conversation
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
📝 WalkthroughSummary by CodeRabbitRelease Notes
WalkthroughUpdates changelog with PR Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~45 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
burgholzer
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks very clean. Just one brief comment. Feel free to ignore and merge.
Description
This pull request fixes an issue which occurs when running the mapping pass on circuits using barriers.
Checklist
If PR contains AI-assisted content:
Assisted-by: [Model Name] via [Tool Name]footer.