Skip to content

[ci] Correct kryo statement to mean uses less space - fixes #118 #235

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 22, 2023

Conversation

hazendaz
Copy link
Member

fixes #118

@hazendaz hazendaz self-assigned this Nov 22, 2023
@hazendaz hazendaz merged commit 0c0eb0c into mybatis:master Nov 22, 2023
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 82.143%. remained the same
when pulling 78a989d on hazendaz:master
into c07afea on mybatis:master.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

KryoSerializer is more space consuming than JDKSerializer?
2 participants