Skip to content

[ADDED] Atomic batch publish support#977

Open
AdamPayzant wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
atomic_batch_publish
Open

[ADDED] Atomic batch publish support#977
AdamPayzant wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
atomic_batch_publish

Conversation

@AdamPayzant
Copy link
Collaborator

Adding 2.12 implementation for JetStream Batch Publishing (ADR-50)

AdamPayzant and others added 3 commits March 4, 2026 13:50
Signed-off-by: Edward Payzant <payzantedwardiv@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Edward Payzant <adam@synadia.com>
Signed-off-by: Edward Payzant <adam@synadia.com>
@AdamPayzant AdamPayzant force-pushed the atomic_batch_publish branch from 31b6870 to d313fe5 Compare March 4, 2026 18:51
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 4, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 58.82353% with 21 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 70.30%. Comparing base (6f0f5c4) to head (d313fe5).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/js.c 58.33% 10 Missing and 10 partials ⚠️
src/jsm.c 66.66% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #977      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   70.33%   70.30%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          48       48              
  Lines       17447    17497      +50     
  Branches     3573     3582       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits        12271    12301      +30     
- Misses       1737     1748      +11     
- Partials     3439     3448       +9     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant