Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade eslint from 8.57.1 to 9.4.0 - #930

Closed
lholmquist wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
snyk-fix-fbdeeb1a2a47a6ede8fefd72285c17fb
Closed

[Snyk] Security upgrade eslint from 8.57.1 to 9.4.0#930
lholmquist wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
snyk-fix-fbdeeb1a2a47a6ede8fefd72285c17fb

Conversation

@lholmquist

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • package.json
  • package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
low severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-BRACEEXPANSION-9789073
  508  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)

@lholmquist

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

🎉 Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

security/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details)

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity.

@pacostas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closing for recreating

@pacostas pacostas closed this Jul 21, 2025
@pacostas
pacostas deleted the snyk-fix-fbdeeb1a2a47a6ede8fefd72285c17fb branch July 21, 2025 09:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants