Skip to content

[INF-337] fix: additional hash chunk for file name prefix - #2618

Merged
tikhanovichA merged 5 commits into
developfrom
fix/INF-337/additional-prefix-hash
Jun 24, 2025
Merged

[INF-337] fix: additional hash chunk for file name prefix#2618
tikhanovichA merged 5 commits into
developfrom
fix/INF-337/additional-prefix-hash

Conversation

@KirylHatalski

@KirylHatalski KirylHatalski commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ticket:

https://oat-sa.atlassian.net/browse/INF-337

What's Changed

  • Changes for file hash creation, additional prefix for s3 performance improvements

Please tick the appropriate points

  • Ticket attached or not required
  • Breaking change
  • Configuration change
  • Release version change
  • Tests are running successfully (old and new ones) on my local machine (if applicable)
  • New code is respecting code style rules
  • New code is respecting best practices
  • New code is not subject to concurrency issues (if applicable)
  • Feature is working correctly on my local machine (if applicable)
  • Acceptance criteria are respected
  • Pull request title and description are meaningful

TODO

  • Unit tests
  • E2E tests
  • Update with packages

Dependencies PRs

How to test

  • Explain here how to test or make a small demo to our team how this works

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved the format and structure of generated file IDs for enhanced organization and consistency.

@KirylHatalski
KirylHatalski requested review from a team, Karol-Stelmaczonek, bartlomiejmarszal, pnal and tikhanovichA and removed request for a team June 19, 2025 10:20
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

"""

Walkthrough

The internal logic of the generateId() method in QtiFlysystemFileManager was updated to generate file IDs with a two-character prefix derived from an MD5 hash, followed by a slash and the full hash, and prepended by the file prefix. No changes were made to method signatures or public interfaces.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
models/classes/files/QtiFlysystemFileManager.php Updated generateId() to use a two-character MD5 prefix and hash-based ID structure.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Caller
    participant QtiFlysystemFileManager

    Caller->>QtiFlysystemFileManager: Call generateId()
    QtiFlysystemFileManager->>QtiFlysystemFileManager: Generate MD5 hash from uniqid(mt_rand(), true)
    QtiFlysystemFileManager->>QtiFlysystemFileManager: Extract first 2 chars as prefix
    QtiFlysystemFileManager->>QtiFlysystemFileManager: Concatenate prefix + "/" + hash
    QtiFlysystemFileManager->>QtiFlysystemFileManager: Prepend filePrefix
    QtiFlysystemFileManager-->>Caller: Return generated ID
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Modify generateId to use a two-character random alphanumeric prefix and hash as described in the issue (INF-337)

Assessment against linked issues: Out-of-scope changes

No out-of-scope changes were found.
"""


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Front-end summary Node 18

💯 Total ✅ Passed ⏭️ Skipped ❌ Failed
709 709 0 0

@KirylHatalski
KirylHatalski marked this pull request as ready for review June 19, 2025 11:26
@oat-sa oat-sa deleted a comment from coderabbitai Bot Jun 19, 2025
@KirylHatalski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@tikhanovichA tikhanovichA left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • New code is covered by tests (if applicable)
  • Tests are running successfully (old and new ones) on my local machine (if applicable)
  • New code is respecting code style rules
  • New code is respecting best practices
  • New code is not subject to concurrency issues (if applicable)
  • Feature is working correctly on my local machine (if applicable)
  • Acceptance criteria are respected
  • Pull request title and description are meaningful
  • Pull request's target is not master

Validated with local and GCP filesystems

Comment thread models/classes/files/QtiFlysystemFileManager.php Outdated
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Version

Target Version 48.20.10
Last version 48.20.9

There are 0 BREAKING CHANGE, 0 feature, 5 fixes

@Karol-Stelmaczonek Karol-Stelmaczonek left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • New code is covered by tests (if applicable)
  • Tests are running successfully (old and new ones) on my local machine (if applicable)
  • New code is respecting code style rules
  • New code is respecting best practices
  • New code is not subject to concurrency issues (if applicable)
  • Feature is working correctly on my local machine (if applicable)
  • Acceptance criteria are respected
  • Pull request title and description are meaningful

@tikhanovichA
tikhanovichA merged commit 7f3ac1e into develop Jun 24, 2025
6 checks passed
@tikhanovichA
tikhanovichA deleted the fix/INF-337/additional-prefix-hash branch June 24, 2025 11:03
pnal pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2025
* fix: additional hash for file name prefix

(cherry picked from commit 7f3ac1e)
@pnal pnal mentioned this pull request Jul 7, 2025
pnal added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2025
* chore: update qtism version

* [INF-337] fix: additional hash chunk for file name prefix (#2618)

* fix: additional hash for file name prefix

(cherry picked from commit 7f3ac1e)

---------

Co-authored-by: Kiril Hatalski <KirylHatalski@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants