-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 401
Signal #1700
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Signal #1700
Conversation
src/runtime/reactivity.ts
Outdated
| Promise.resolve().then(() => { | ||
| scheduled = false; | ||
| processAtoms(); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If I understand this correctly, asynchronous state at the lowest level is really not ideal, this will make the code extremely complex if we need to wait something whenever we write a value before accessing dependent values.
Refactoring of the reactivity system in Owl