Skip to content

Conversation

@nguyenntph
Copy link

No description provided.

@robodoo
Copy link

robodoo commented Nov 18, 2025

Pull request status dashboard

@nguyenntph nguyenntph marked this pull request as draft November 18, 2025 13:20
@nguyenntph nguyenntph marked this pull request as ready for review November 18, 2025 13:32
Copy link
Contributor

@clbr-odoo clbr-odoo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice to see that you know of to rewrite your git history & force-push.
I advice to use the --force-with-lease option if you haven't, as a general security.

Very good job so far 👍
Props for the clean indentation of the Python file 🥳

- Inline views
- Statusbar
- Sort order
- Field options
- Readonly
- Color picker
- Editable list view
- Decorators
- Fix no create/edit
- Add offer link
- Add domain
Copy link

@yoba-odoo yoba-odoo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice work 👏
Left some non-blocking comments

Comment on lines 48 to 65
<group>
<field name="property_id"/>
</group>
<group>
<field name="partner_id"/>
</group>
<group>
<field name="price"/>
</group>
<group>
<field name="status"/>
</group>
<group>
<field name="validity" string="Validity (days)"/>
</group>
<group>
<field name="date_deadline" string="Deadline"/>
</group>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You don't have to put each field alone in a group. Am I missing something?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like we don't. This is the code block we used as example in Chapter 6, using group for each fields.

Codeblock

I tried having the fields in 1 group and everything works fine.

- Model description
- Error messages
- Views group
- Default data type
- Simplify conditional check
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants