Skip to content

Comments

chore: update URLs to openclaw-ansible#14

Closed
pasogott wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
docs/repo-rename-openclaw-ansible
Closed

chore: update URLs to openclaw-ansible#14
pasogott wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
docs/repo-rename-openclaw-ansible

Conversation

@pasogott
Copy link
Collaborator

@pasogott pasogott commented Feb 4, 2026

Updates documentation and install script URLs to point at the upcoming repo name openclaw/openclaw-ansible.

Important: this should only be merged after the GitHub repository itself has been renamed from clawdbot-ansible to openclaw-ansible (otherwise the links will 404).

Lint note (local/Homebrew): if ansible-lint complains about missing collections (e.g. it can't resolve ansible.posix.authorized_key), run:

  • ansible-galaxy collection install -r requirements.yml

On some Homebrew setups you may also need to set ANSIBLE_COLLECTIONS_PATH to include both the bundled collections path and your user collections path, e.g.:

  • /opt/homebrew/.../site-packages/ansible_collections
  • ~/.ansible/collections/ansible_collections

Credit: the repo-rename + OpenClaw rebrand work was originally raised/implemented in #12 by @steflsd (and a similar rebrand proposal exists in #13 by @olsonale). This PR is the minimal URL-only prep step.

@thewilloftheshadow
Copy link
Member

Repo has been renamed now by org maintainers

@alauppe
Copy link
Member

alauppe commented Feb 10, 2026

Closing as superseded by the merge of PR #13.

Thank you @pasogott for the thoughtful approach here - creating a minimal URL-only PR as a prep step, properly noting the dependency on the repo rename, and crediting the original work in #12 and #13. That kind of coordination and attribution is exactly what makes open source work well.

The URLs are now updated as part of the full rename merge. Appreciate your contribution!

@alauppe alauppe closed this Feb 10, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants