Conversation
clarified the role of PDF Association
bdoubrov
requested review from
LonelyMidoriya,
MaximPlusov,
bundolee,
hnc-jglee and
hyunhee-jo
as code owners
Contributor
WalkthroughDocumentation page updated to rephrase the collaboration as being based on PDF Association specifications and best-practice guides, remove the PDF Association logo from the initial logo row, add a “Partner members of the PDF Association” link, and render the PDF Association logo in a dedicated container beneath that link. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Suggested reviewers
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@content/docs/tagged-pdf-collaboration.mdx`:
- Line 34: The page mixes direct-partnership language with standards-based
framing; locate the sentence containing the phrase "By working with the PDF
Association" and change it to mirror the standards-based wording used earlier
(e.g., "In alignment with PDF Association specifications" or "Based on PDF
Association specifications and best practices") so the page consistently
presents collaboration as standards-driven rather than a direct partnership.
- Around line 11-14: Replace the awkward link text "[Partner
members](https://pdfa.org/member/?wpv-wpcf-member-status=4)" with clearer
wording "Partner members of the PDF Association" (keeping the same href) so the
displayed text reads "Partner members of the PDF Association" instead of
"Partner members of PDF Association"; locate the link text in the block
containing the div with className="flex flex-col md:flex-row justify-center
items-center gap-8 mb-8 bg-white p-6 rounded-lg" and update only the visible
link text while preserving the existing anchor URL and surrounding markup.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 4503e1b0-b57b-4830-8f6e-ca172e436211
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
content/docs/tagged-pdf-collaboration.mdx
| ### 2.1. A Collaborative Solution | ||
|
|
||
| This challenge presents a unique opportunity for innovation. Hancom and Dual Lab are collaborating with the PDF Association to drive a solution. | ||
| This challenge presents a unique opportunity for innovation. Hancom and Dual Lab are collaborating based on PDF Association specifications and best practice guides to drive a solution. |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Resolve remaining partnership-language inconsistency on this page.
Line 34 correctly reframes collaboration as standards-based, but the page still later says “By working with the PDF Association” (Line 45), which reintroduces the direct-partnership framing this PR is trying to remove. Please align that sentence with the new positioning to avoid contradictory public messaging.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@content/docs/tagged-pdf-collaboration.mdx` at line 34, The page mixes
direct-partnership language with standards-based framing; locate the sentence
containing the phrase "By working with the PDF Association" and change it to
mirror the standards-based wording used earlier (e.g., "In alignment with PDF
Association specifications" or "Based on PDF Association specifications and best
practices") so the page consistently presents collaboration as standards-driven
rather than a direct partnership.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
content/docs/tagged-pdf-collaboration.mdx (1)
34-34:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 MajorResolve remaining messaging inconsistency on Line 45.
Line 34 correctly uses standards-based framing, but Line 45 still says “By working with the PDF Association,” which reintroduces direct-partnership wording. Line 45 also has duplicated text (“for AI reuse for AI reuse”).
✏️ Suggested wording alignment
-Our vision is to not only be the first to develop a robust Tagged PDF data extraction tool for AI reuse for AI reuse but also to actively contribute to the global standards that govern it. By working with the PDF Association, we aim to engage the larger industry to facilitate the use of Tagged PDF as a trustworthy and efficient asset for the entire AI ecosystem. +Our vision is to not only be the first to develop a robust Tagged PDF data extraction tool for AI reuse, but also to actively contribute to the global standards that govern it. Based on PDF Association specifications and best practice guides, we aim to engage the larger industry to facilitate the use of Tagged PDF as a trustworthy and efficient asset for the entire AI ecosystem.As per coding guidelines,
Content in content/docs/ auto-syncs to opendataloader.org on release.Also applies to: 45-45
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@content/docs/tagged-pdf-collaboration.mdx` at line 34, Update the messaging on Line 45 to match the standards-based framing used on Line 34 by replacing the phrase "By working with the PDF Association," with a neutral, standards-focused formulation (e.g., reference to "based on PDF Association specifications" or similar) and remove the duplicated fragment "for AI reuse for AI reuse"; ensure the sentence mirrors the tone and wording of the sentence on Line 34 so the auto-synced content in content/docs/ is consistent.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Duplicate comments:
In `@content/docs/tagged-pdf-collaboration.mdx`:
- Line 34: Update the messaging on Line 45 to match the standards-based framing
used on Line 34 by replacing the phrase "By working with the PDF Association,"
with a neutral, standards-focused formulation (e.g., reference to "based on PDF
Association specifications" or similar) and remove the duplicated fragment "for
AI reuse for AI reuse"; ensure the sentence mirrors the tone and wording of the
sentence on Line 34 so the auto-synced content in content/docs/ is consistent.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: ba5210a6-7e5e-43cc-87d5-e6f9889994cb
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
content/docs/tagged-pdf-collaboration.mdx
bundolee
approved these changes
Apr 13, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
clarified the role of PDF Association
Summary by CodeRabbit