Skip to content

Conversation

@vy
Copy link
Contributor

@vy vy commented Oct 17, 2025

Validate and clamp the value populated from the jdk.httpclient.bufsize system property. Added two new tests: Does clamping work? Does the minimum value wedge the client?


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8367976: Validate and clamp jdk.httpclient.bufsize (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27874/head:pull/27874
$ git checkout pull/27874

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/27874
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27874/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 27874

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 27874

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27874.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 17, 2025

👋 Welcome back vyazici! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 17, 2025

@vy This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8367976: Validate and clamp jdk.httpclient.bufsize

Reviewed-by: dfuchs

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 26 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 17, 2025

@vy The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • net

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 17, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 17, 2025

@dfuch
Copy link
Member

dfuch commented Oct 20, 2025

You will also need to update module-info.java where the property is documented, to indicate what is the range of valid values and what happens if an invalid value is provided.

https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/8c775e299dbf651c3be1ba84b9e50356a3503861/src/java.net.http/share/classes/module-info.java#L49C1-L52C9

@vy
Copy link
Contributor Author

vy commented Oct 20, 2025

You will also need to update module-info.java

Implemented in 148d426. I presume this warrants a CSR, right?

@dfuch
Copy link
Member

dfuch commented Oct 20, 2025

It's an implementation specific property - so not part of the Java SE specification. IMO it was a bug that we didn't clamp it in the first place. There's no real change in observable behaviour here. I am not sure we actually need a CSR.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 21, 2025

@vy Please do not rebase or force-push to an active PR as it invalidates existing review comments. Note for future reference, the bots always squash all changes into a single commit automatically as part of the integration. See OpenJDK Developers’ Guide for more information.

Copy link
Member

@dfuch dfuch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 22, 2025
@vy
Copy link
Contributor Author

vy commented Oct 22, 2025

@dfuch, thanks so much for the review feedback – it, as always, certainly helped.

Tier 1-2 is clear on several platforms.

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 22, 2025

Going to push as commit cbbb0a8.
Since your change was applied there have been 29 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Oct 22, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 22, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 22, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 22, 2025

@vy Pushed as commit cbbb0a8.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

integrated Pull request has been integrated net [email protected]

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants