Skip to content

8314319: LogCompilation doesn't reset lateInlining when it encounters a failure. #3545

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

satyenme
Copy link

@satyenme satyenme commented May 5, 2025

Backporting JDK-8314319: LogCompilation doesn't reset lateInlining when it encounters a failure. Fixes issue where compilation encounters a failure after it processes '<late_inline>' tag, and, in cases where the C2 compiler retries after tweaking options it omits subsume_load. Adds test. Ran GHA Sanity Checks, local Tier 1 and 2 tests. Patch is clean.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8314319 needs maintainer approval

Warning

 ⚠️ Found trailing period in issue title for 8314319: LogCompilation doesn't reset lateInlining when it encounters a failure.

Issue

  • JDK-8314319: LogCompilation doesn't reset lateInlining when it encounters a failure. (Bug - P4 - Requested)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3545/head:pull/3545
$ git checkout pull/3545

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/3545
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3545/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 3545

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 3545

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3545.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 5, 2025

👋 Welcome back ssubramaniam! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 5, 2025

@satyenme This change is no longer ready for integration - check the PR body for details.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport e9e0c5699b8d0fbd1bd3a6caa3e0182a2e5bdda3 8314319: LogCompilation doesn't reset lateInlining when it encounters a failure. May 5, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 5, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 5, 2025

⚠️ @satyenme This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label May 5, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 5, 2025

Webrevs

@satyenme
Copy link
Author

satyenme commented May 5, 2025

/approval request for backport. One line fix to address issue where compilation encounters a failure after it processes '<late_inline>' tag, and, in cases where the C2 compiler retries after tweaking options, it omits subsume_load

Risk: Low. Tip change was merged in September 2023 and PR adds a test to confirm functionality.

Testing:

  • GHA Sanity Checks
  • Tier 1 and 2 tests locally
  • src/utils/LogCompilation/src/test/java/com/sun/hotspot/tools/compiler/TestPrebuiltLogs.java

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 5, 2025

@satyenme
8314319: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added approval ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval ready Pull request is ready to be integrated labels May 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approval backport clean rfr Pull request is ready for review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant