Skip to content

ci: add missing FBC catalog for console-plugin-operator-fbc-4-22 - #83

Open
anandkuma77 wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
anandkuma77:customise-tekton
Open

ci: add missing FBC catalog for console-plugin-operator-fbc-4-22#83
anandkuma77 wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
anandkuma77:customise-tekton

Conversation

@anandkuma77

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The console-plugin-operator-fbc-4-22-on-pull-request/on-push Konflux pipelines expect a File-Based Catalog Containerfile at catalog/v4.22/Containerfile, but the catalog/ directory was never added, so every run fails with "Cannot find Dockerfile catalog/v4.22/Containerfile".

Add the FBC structure, mirroring the pattern used by openshift/cert-manager-operator-release (catalog/v4.22/Containerfile + catalog/v4.22/catalog//{package,channel,bundle-*}.yaml), populated from this repo's existing operator bundle metadata (package: ocp-secrets-management-operator, channel: alpha, v0.1.0). Image references use the registry.stage.redhat.io prefix required by Enterprise Contract's olm.allowed_registries_related check.

Validated locally with opm validate and opm serve --cache-only using the quay.io/operator-framework/opm image.

The console-plugin-operator-fbc-4-22-on-pull-request/on-push Konflux
pipelines expect a File-Based Catalog Containerfile at
catalog/v4.22/Containerfile, but the catalog/ directory was never
added, so every run fails with "Cannot find Dockerfile
catalog/v4.22/Containerfile".

Add the FBC structure, mirroring the pattern used by
openshift/cert-manager-operator-release (catalog/v4.22/Containerfile +
catalog/v4.22/catalog/<package>/{package,channel,bundle-*}.yaml),
populated from this repo's existing operator bundle metadata
(package: ocp-secrets-management-operator, channel: alpha, v0.1.0).
Image references use the registry.stage.redhat.io prefix required by
Enterprise Contract's olm.allowed_registries_related check.

Validated locally with `opm validate` and `opm serve --cache-only`
using the quay.io/operator-framework/opm image.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 3, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@anandkuma77
anandkuma77 marked this pull request as ready for review July 3, 2026 10:44
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 3, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@anandkuma77: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/verify 598f206 link true /test verify

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant