-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
(Blocked by CLOUDWF-11310 AND CLOUDDST-30414 ) OCPBUGS-65557: [Default Catalog Tests] Upgrade dependencies to use OPM 1.61.0 for the OCP 4.21 release #545
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
@camilamacedo86: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue. In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: camilamacedo86 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
e0203b7 to
a817ab7
Compare
a817ab7 to
0bcea32
Compare
|
@camilamacedo86: This pull request references OPRUN-4251 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/test default-catalog-consistency |
0bcea32 to
15c4a80
Compare
|
@camilamacedo86: This pull request references OPRUN-4251 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
87f7822 to
5602913
Compare
|
@camilamacedo86: This pull request references OPRUN-4251 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@camilamacedo86: This pull request references OPRUN-4251 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@camilamacedo86: This pull request references OPRUN-4251 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
5602913 to
6fe94bb
Compare
6fe94bb to
71fae04
Compare
71fae04 to
378a16e
Compare
|
@camilamacedo86: This pull request references OPRUN-4251 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
378a16e to
d067e78
Compare
|
@camilamacedo86: This pull request references OPRUN-4251 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@camilamacedo86: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65557, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@camilamacedo86: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65557, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/test openshift-e2e-aws |
|
/retest-required |
|
This one will not pass until they reach out the maintainers and fix the bad config in the indexes. See: OCPBUGS-65557 . It is blocked. |
|
Can you remove that file? I'll give it the OK when that's done |
…e OPM 1.61.0 used on the 4.21 OCP release
d067e78 to
6a0f867
Compare
|
@camilamacedo86: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/assign @bandrade |
Summary
This PR updates our dependencies to the latest compatible versions.
What changed
Why
Blocked By
More info: https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C08D3G4EMRA/p1762898753062719?thread_ts=1762641686.601059&cid=C08D3G4EMRA