Skip to content

Conversation

nhorman
Copy link
Contributor

@nhorman nhorman commented Apr 15, 2024

jq is a nice handy tool to do json parsing, use it instead of python

@t8m t8m requested a review from levitte May 10, 2024 13:57
Copy link
Contributor

@Sashan Sashan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good

@t8m t8m requested a review from a team May 20, 2024 08:21
@t8m
Copy link
Member

t8m commented Oct 1, 2025

@nhorman This needs rebase.

@nhorman
Copy link
Contributor Author

nhorman commented Oct 1, 2025

done

Copy link
Contributor

@paulidale paulidale left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not entirely convinced that this change is worthwhile. It's not saving much in terms of lines of code, it's introducing a third party dependency and it's moving the parsing out of python into a separate process. The benefit seems to be an improvement in a section of code that isn't oft modified and isn't that difficult to understand.

nhorman added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2025
jq is a nice handy tool to do json parsing, use it instead of python

Reviewed-by: Saša Nedvědický <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <[email protected]>
(Merged from #192)
@nhorman
Copy link
Contributor Author

nhorman commented Oct 2, 2025

merged to master, thank you!

@nhorman nhorman closed this Oct 2, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Awaits review to Done in Project Board Oct 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants