security/tailscale #331
security/tailscale #331
Conversation
|
+1 on seeing this added |
| @@ -201,6 +201,7 @@ security/strongswan | |||
| security/stunnel arm | |||
| security/sudo | |||
| security/suricata arm,aarch64 | |||
| security/tailscale arm,aarch64 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why ignore arm and aarch64?
https://www.freshports.org/security/tailscale/ shows it works on both arches.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
usually just to not pollute build time for others... also because build has not been verified as we 99% deal with amd64
|
this is still open as it hasn't been discussed internally and we like to avoid GUIs on top of GUIs when we can |
Are you planning to make a new plugin for it? |
|
well that would be the main question to discuss ;) |
|
I vote for yes ;) |
|
If we neither have funding nor a customer with a use case I think this is going to flop, because we can't just add stuff. I expect this to be a couple of days work at least. |
|
So tailscale is aware and we proposed a cooperation a while back but at the moment there is no response from them so this stays parked right here. |
Add tailscale to the show .. time to add a plugin for it :)