Fix memcheck errors like "Syscall param sendmsg(msg.msg_control) points to uninitialised byte(s)"#17
Closed
DL6ER wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Fix memcheck errors like "Syscall param sendmsg(msg.msg_control) points to uninitialised byte(s)"#17DL6ER wants to merge 1 commit into
DL6ER wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…ts to uninitialised byte(s)" Signed-off-by: DL6ER <dl6er@dl6er.de>
Member
Author
|
Merged in slightly modified form |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hey Simon,
another patch fixing a small memcheck error reported during Pi-hole
testing. The error is caused in send_from() (forward.c) by handing a
partially uninitialized stack variable to sendmsg() when nowild == false.
Full error output (example):
==1052839== Syscall param sendmsg(msg.msg_control) points to
uninitialised byte(s)
==1052839== at 0x4B7199D: __libc_sendmsg (sendmsg.c:28)
==1052839== by 0x4B7199D: sendmsg (sendmsg.c:25)
==1052839== by 0x21EADB: send_from (forward.c:101)
==1052839== by 0x222551: receive_query (forward.c:1988)
==1052839== by 0x20FD6A: check_dns_listeners (dnsmasq.c:1886)
==1052839== by 0x2120EF: main (dnsmasq.c:1278)
==1052839== Location 0x1fff000098is 24bytes inside local var "control_u"
==1052839== declared at forward.c:49, in frame #1of thread 1
==1052839== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
==1052839== at 0x21EA11: send_from (forward.c:38)
Note that the line-numbers are not necessarily 100% accurate. We have
not noticed any abnormal behavior, however, fixing this reported error
is easy enough.
Best,
Dominik
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2024q3/017654.html