Skip to content

Conversation

@gabrielmougard
Copy link

We have a discrepancy between our Prebid Server and our Tag/PrebidJS integration. It’s not replacing the bidrequest.Imp[0].TagID with our internal value when a TagID is already present.

We are able to deliver because the value is set in the bidrequest.Imp[0].Ext.placementID field, but this creates discrepancies between the connectors, and it’s not ideal.

We have a discrepancy between our Prebid Server and our Tag/PrebidJS integration. It’s not replacing the `bidrequest.Imp[0].TagID` with our internal value when a TagID is already present.

We are able to deliver because the value is set in the `bidrequest.Imp[0].Ext.placementID` field, but this creates discrepancies between the connectors, and it’s not ideal.
@github-actions
Copy link

Code coverage summary

Note:

  • Prebid team doesn't anticipate tests covering code paths that might result in marshal and unmarshal errors
  • Coverage summary encompasses all commits leading up to the latest one, c20c98a

mobkoi

Refer here for heat map coverage report

github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v3/adapters/mobkoi/mobkoi.go:27:	Builder		100.0%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v3/adapters/mobkoi/mobkoi.go:34:	MakeRequests	90.9%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v3/adapters/mobkoi/mobkoi.go:80:	MakeBids	100.0%
total:									(statements)	94.6%

@bsardo bsardo added the adapter label Jan 6, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants