#313 Migration fails due to Many to Many relation ship tables. Table … #314
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…bles. Table name sorting has been removed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As described the issue before, the lightweight migration fails due to Many to Many relation tables.
While migration, Source and Destination table names are different. It might be happening because of
sortingthe table names array in thetableNameForPreviousRelationship()Else we have interchange the
inverseandrelationshipnames at thetableNameForRelationship()Both options are resolving the migration crash. I decided to remove the
sortingoption instead of interchange theinverseandrelationshiptable names.Thanks