Feature/digitalocean multi agent deployment

[rahul240699]

Added Digital ocean single and multi agent deployment

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds comprehensive DigitalOcean deployment support for NANDA agents, enabling both single and multi-agent deployments on DigitalOcean droplets. The changes introduce two new deployment scripts with similar functionality to existing AWS deployment scripts, along with detailed documentation.

Key Changes:

• Added single-agent deployment script for DigitalOcean with configurable parameters
• Added multi-agent deployment script supporting supervisor-based process management
• Updated main scripts README to reference DigitalOcean as a supported cloud provider

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 9 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
scripts/digitalocean/single-agent-deployment.sh	New script for deploying a single NANDA agent on DigitalOcean droplet with full configuration options
scripts/digitalocean/multi-agent-deployment.sh	New script for deploying multiple agents on one droplet using supervisor for process management
scripts/digitalocean/README.md	Comprehensive documentation for DigitalOcean deployments including usage examples, troubleshooting, and best practices
scripts/aws/README.md	Updated to indicate multi-cloud support and reference DigitalOcean documentation
scripts/README.md	Updated to list DigitalOcean as a supported provider and reorganize documentation structure

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

scripts/digitalocean/README.md:1

• Documentation states REGISTRY_URL is 'Optional' but the actual script at line 54 of single-agent-deployment.sh shows 'None' as the default when no value is provided, not 'http://registry.chat39.com:6900'. The documentation should either show 'None' as the default or clarify this discrepancy.

# DigitalOcean Deployment Scripts for NANDA Agents

---

_{Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.}

[Dislevekanku]

Hi @rahul240699, great work on adding DigitalOcean support. I reviewed the deployment for the single agent script and overall it’s clean, well-structured, and easy to follow. A few notes:

What’s working well:

Clear positional arguments with sensible defaults

Good validation and error handling (set -e, doctl install/auth checks)

Strong logging and user guidance

Robust IP retrieval logic with retries and validation

Automatic SSH key and firewall setup is convenient

PUBLIC_URL generation is correct and reliable

Suggestions / Questions:

1. API key handling (security)
   ANTHROPIC_API_KEY is passed as a positional argument, which exposes it in shell history and ps.
   Suggestion: support an env var first, fallback to arg:

ANTHROPIC_API_KEY="${ANTHROPIC_API_KEY:-$2}"

2. No cleanup if deployment fails halfway
   With set -e, failures after droplet/firewall creation leave resources running.
   Suggestion: optional cleanup trap to delete partial resources.

3. Optional enhancement
   A lightweight post-deployment health check (curl) could help users confirm the agent is running.

[Dislevekanku]

I reviewed the multi-agent DigitalOcean deployment script. A few notes:

What’s working well:

Clear parameter structure (API key + JSON config + optional settings)

Good validation: JSON parsing, port uniqueness checks, and resource-size warnings

Strong use of supervisor for managing multiple agents (more robust than nohup)

Firewall rules generated dynamically based on agent ports

Reliable PUBLIC_URL computation for each agent

Helpful per-agent health checks and excellent logging throughout

Clear final summary with all agent URLs, SSH instructions, and cleanup commands

Suggestions / Questions:

1. API key handling (security)
   Same as the single-agent script: ANTHROPIC_API_KEY is passed as a positional arg and will appear in shell history / ps.
   Suggestion: support environment variables first, fallback to arg.

2. No cleanup if deployment fails midway
   If droplet or firewall creation succeeds but a later step fails, resources remain running.
   Suggestion: consider adding an optional cleanup trap.

3. JSON config input
   Accepting JSON strings is useful, but file-based config is safer.
   Might be worth recommending file-based usage in the README.