Skip to content

Tests for 3582 - #3592

Closed
guineveresaenger wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
guin/docs/fix-spelling
Closed

Tests for 3582#3592
guineveresaenger wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
guin/docs/fix-spelling

Conversation

@guineveresaenger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Running tests

Signed-off-by: Vladislav Doster <mvdoster@gmail.com>
@eon-pulumi

eon-pulumi Bot commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Verdict: Approved

Diff is a two-line, docs-only spelling fix (mirroring PR #3582) with no code, schema, or test surface changed; both corrections are verifiably accurate and self-evidently low risk. Automated low-risk assessment, not a human review.


View session · Was this review helpful? Yes · No

@unblocked unblocked Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ No issues found

About Unblocked

Unblocked has been set up to automatically review your team's pull requests to identify genuine bugs and issues.

📖 Documentation — Learn more in our docs.

💬 Ask questions — Mention @unblocked to request a review or summary, or ask follow-up questions.

👍 Give feedback — React to comments with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve.

⚙️ Customize — Adjust settings in your preferences.

@eon-pulumi-agent eon-pulumi-agent Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed this PR, which mirrors PR #3582 (docs: correct spelling) to run CI on the change.

The diff is a purely textual, two-line documentation fix:

  • docs/guides/automatic-token-mapping.md: "token maping" -> "token mapping" in a code-comment example.
  • docs/guides/docs-edits.md: "reads from files fo find" -> "reads from files to find" in prose.

Both corrections are accurate and don't change any code semantics, examples, or rendered structure. No Go files, schemas, or generated artifacts are touched, so no AGENTS.md rules on generated content or cross-layer coupling apply. No tests are warranted for a comment/prose typo fix. I found no correctness, security, or compliance issues.

Required CI checks are still in progress at review time (no failures observed), which I'm treating as incomplete-but-not-blocking evidence given the mechanical, self-evidently-correct nature of the change.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 70.48%. Comparing base (2d1b4ed) to head (da2beb4).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3592   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   70.47%   70.48%           
=======================================
  Files         358      358           
  Lines       39474    39474           
=======================================
+ Hits        27820    27822    +2     
+ Misses       9705     9704    -1     
+ Partials     1949     1948    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants