-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
Pr 451 - modified and added tests to statespace #466
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Dekermanjian
wants to merge
7
commits into
pymc-devs:main
Choose a base branch
from
Dekermanjian:pr-451
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
abfe3b0
Use `set_data` in forecast
jessegrabowski 0961032
Ignore new numpy matmul warnings in tests
jessegrabowski 029a9a1
Tracking down data bug
jessegrabowski 819afef
resolved merge conflicts environment-test.yml
Dekermanjian e44331b
added and modified statespace tests
Dekermanjian 3d9dd92
added logic to update static shape of target when forecasting with ex…
Dekermanjian cfcb0be
make sure updated dummy target has correct dimensions
Dekermanjian File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ | ||
name: pymc-extras-test | ||
name: pymc-extras | ||
channels: | ||
- conda-forge | ||
- nodefaults | ||
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added this logic to update the static shape of the target variable when forecasting. I realize that this logic is naive in a few aspects:
1). This is making an assumption on how the scenario data is constructed(I think I resolved that)2). The timing of when this is being called may be inappropriate
3). Probably other things that I am not thinking of right now
With your suggestions I can make this more robust, I just wanted to confirm that my suspicion that the issue is that the static shape of the target needs to be updated to reflect the shape of the forecast index?
EDIT:
Sorry about the multiple pings, I didn't highlight all of the code.
I should also mention that these do pass the unit tests in test_statespace.py