Skip to content

Conversation

maresb
Copy link
Contributor

@maresb maresb commented Oct 17, 2025

Description

The recent v5.26.0 transitively requires Python >=3.11 via PyTensor. While "technically" correct, we shouldn't allow a Python version that is not installable.

Related Issue

Checklist

Type of change

  • New feature / enhancement
  • Bug fix
  • Documentation
  • Maintenance
  • Other (please specify):

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pymc--7924.org.readthedocs.build/en/7924/

The recent v5.26.0 transitively requires Python >=3.11 via PyTensor.
While "technically" correct, we shouldn't allow a Python version that is not installable.
maresb added a commit to regro-cf-autotick-bot/pymc-feedstock that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 17, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.47%. Comparing base (f80e896) to head (c3250b0).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #7924   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.47%   91.47%           
=======================================
  Files         116      116           
  Lines       18904    18904           
=======================================
  Hits        17292    17292           
  Misses       1612     1612           
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Member

@ricardoV94 ricardoV94 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So many places to specify dependencies :)

@ricardoV94 ricardoV94 merged commit c7222f0 into main Oct 17, 2025
30 checks passed
@ricardoV94
Copy link
Member

Need a new release @maresb ?

@ricardoV94 ricardoV94 deleted the maresb-patch-1 branch October 17, 2025 11:05
@maresb
Copy link
Contributor Author

maresb commented Oct 17, 2025

Ideally yes, but it's not "broken" broken, so only if you feel like it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants