Skip to content

Conversation

chrysn
Copy link

@chrysn chrysn commented Sep 15, 2025

This is a shot at #205.

Frankly, I'm not super happy with it -- it's threading the extras quite wide through it, and it has the unsightly constraint that it only really works well with a single requirement (for it'd be quite unlikely that the same extras make sense for multiple requirements). I'll leave it here mainly as a discussion tool to find out whether #205 (comment) is really pointing in a good direction (and to see what CI has to say, for I have no clue how I'd test this a full pyodide around it).

@ryanking13
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the draft implementation. Do you think supporting snowballstemmer[extras] @ https://.../snowballstemmer.*.whl syntax would make things easier? If the implementation is cleaner, I think I am okay with that approach too.

@chrysn
Copy link
Author

chrysn commented Sep 22, 2025

Closing in favor of #254, which seems to be on a good track

@chrysn chrysn closed this Sep 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants