Skip to content

[CI Optimization]: Optimize Jenkins Pipeline for Efficient Resource Utilization #391

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

abukhoy
Copy link
Contributor

@abukhoy abukhoy commented May 6, 2025

This PR optimizes the Jenkins pipeline to improve resource utilization, reduce testing time, and enhance parallelization. Key changes include:

  1. Fixed Number of Workers
  2. Enhanced Parallelization

Changes Made

  • Updated Run CLI Tests to use -n 1.
  • Updated Run QNN CLI Tests to use -n 2.
  • Updated Run QNN Non-CLI Tests to use -n 2.
  • Enhanced parallel execution of stages. (experimental)

Testing

  • Local Testing: N/A
  • CI Testing: Going

Impact

  • Reduced Turnaround Time: N/A
  • Improved Resource Utilization: N/A

Checklist

  • Code changes tested locally.
  • CI pipeline runs successfully with changes.

Note: It is on experiment stage, not final.

Signed-off-by: Abukhoyer Shaik <[email protected]>
stage('CLI and Vllm Tests'){
parallel {
stage('CLI Tests') {
steps {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As discussed yesterday we need to avoid parallelism for CLI and VLLM Test.

Also we discussed to have 4 jenkin jobs corresponding to each PR.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I am working on it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants