Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automated Resyntax fixes #478

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Automated Resyntax fixes #478

wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

resyntax-ci[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@resyntax-ci resyntax-ci bot commented Jan 29, 2025

Resyntax fixed 20 issues in 9 files.

  • Fixed 4 occurrences of if-begin-to-cond
  • Fixed 3 occurrences of map-to-for
  • Fixed 3 occurrences of let-to-define
  • Fixed 2 occurrences of if-let-to-cond
  • Fixed 2 occurrences of quasiquote-to-list
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of ormap-to-for/or
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of or-hash-ref-set!-to-hash-ref!
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of cond-let-to-cond-define
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of quasiquote-to-append
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of when-expression-in-for-loop-to-when-keyword
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of define-syntax-syntax-rules-to-define-syntax-rule

resyntax-ci bot added 11 commits January 29, 2025 00:15
This quasiquotation is equialent to a simple `list` call.
`cond` with internal definitions is preferred over `if` with `let`, to reduce nesting
Using `cond` instead of `if` here makes `begin` unnecessary
This `map` operation can be replaced with a `for/list` loop.
This `define-syntax` macro can be replaced with a simpler, equivalent `define-syntax-rule` macro.
Internal definitions are recommended instead of `let` expressions, to reduce nesting.
This `ormap` operation can be replaced with a `for/or` loop.
Use the `#:when` keyword instead of `when` to reduce loop body indentation.
Internal definitions are recommended instead of `let` expressions, to reduce nesting.
This quasiquotation is equialent to calling `append`.
This expression can be replaced with a simpler, equivalent `hash-ref!` expression.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants