Skip to content

Automated Resyntax fixes #1431

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 20 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Automated Resyntax fixes #1431

wants to merge 20 commits into from

Conversation

resyntax-ci[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@resyntax-ci resyntax-ci bot commented Jan 24, 2025

Resyntax fixed 50 issues in 18 files.

  • Fixed 9 occurrences of let-to-define
  • Fixed 8 occurrences of single-clause-match-to-match-define
  • Fixed 6 occurrences of define-syntax-syntax-rules-to-define-syntax-rule
  • Fixed 4 occurrences of quasiquote-to-list
  • Fixed 4 occurrences of if-else-false-to-and
  • Fixed 3 occurrences of sort-with-keyed-comparator-to-sort-by-key
  • Fixed 2 occurrences of zero-comparison-to-positive?
  • Fixed 2 occurrences of define-values-values-to-define
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of define-simple-macro-to-define-syntax-parse-rule
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of cond-let-to-cond-define
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of if-let-to-cond
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of provide-deduplication
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of when-expression-in-for-loop-to-when-keyword
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of for/fold-result-keyword
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of apply-append-for-loop-to-for-loop
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of always-throwing-if-to-when
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of inverted-when
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of map-to-for
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of apply-flattening
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of define-lambda-to-define

resyntax-ci bot added 20 commits January 24, 2025 00:28
The `define` form supports a shorthand for defining functions.
Internal definitions are recommended instead of `let` expressions, to reduce nesting.
This `define-syntax` macro can be replaced with a simpler, equivalent `define-syntax-rule` macro.
This `if` expression can be refactored to an equivalent expression using `and`.
This negated `when` expression can be replaced by an `unless` expression.
This expression is equivalent to calling the `positive?` predicate.
The `define-simple-macro` form has been renamed to `define-syntax-parse-rule`.
Providing the same identifier multiple times is unnecessary.
`cond` with internal definitions is preferred over `if` with `let`, to reduce nesting
The `apply` function accepts single arguments in addition to a trailing list argument.
This `match` expression can be simplified using `match-define`.
This use of `define-values` is unnecessary.
This quasiquotation is equialent to a simple `list` call.
This `sort` expression can be replaced with a simpler, equivalent expression.
Using `when` and `unless` is simpler than a conditional with an always-throwing branch.
Internal definitions are recommended instead of `let` expressions, to reduce nesting.
This `map` operation can be replaced with a `for/list` loop.
Only one of the `for/fold` expression's result values is used. Use the `#:result` keyword to return just that result.
Instead of using `(apply append ...)` to flatten a list of lists, consider using `for*/list` to flatten the list.
Use the `#:when` keyword instead of `when` to reduce loop body indentation.
(locate-stx e))
e))))
(define l (current-logger))
(locate-stx e)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Losing this binding isn't wanted, although I see how it happened.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant