Cleanup: streamline payment link signature checking #318
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…rs everytime where we just need to check if a string exists in the parameters.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This update refactors the
verify_payment_link_signaturemethod for improved clarity and reliability. Key validations are now handled with an early-return approach, reducing nesting and making the logic easier to follow.Note :- Please follow the below points while attaching test cases document link below:
- If label
Testedis added then test cases document URL is mandatory.- Link added should be a valid URL and accessible throughout the org.
- If the branch name contains hotfix / revert by default the BVT workflow check will pass.