Skip to content

fuzz: add target for tapscript parsing from script#792

Merged
apoelstra merged 1 commit intorust-bitcoin:masterfrom
brunoerg:2025-02-fuzz-miniscript-tap
Mar 2, 2025
Merged

fuzz: add target for tapscript parsing from script#792
apoelstra merged 1 commit intorust-bitcoin:masterfrom
brunoerg:2025-02-fuzz-miniscript-tap

Conversation

@brunoerg
Copy link
Contributor

This PR adds a new fuzz target to parse a miniscript from script hex for Tap. We currently have one target that does it for Segwitv0.

@apoelstra
Copy link
Member

Nice! CI failures are unrelated.

@apoelstra
Copy link
Member

Blocked on #790 -- I can't test locally without that.

@apoelstra
Copy link
Member

Sorry for the delay -- can you rebase on master now that #790 is in?

@brunoerg brunoerg force-pushed the 2025-02-fuzz-miniscript-tap branch from 7c8b95c to f96bf24 Compare March 1, 2025 20:21
@brunoerg
Copy link
Contributor Author

brunoerg commented Mar 1, 2025

Sorry for the delay -- can you rebase on master now that #790 is in?

Done.

Copy link
Member

@apoelstra apoelstra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK f96bf24; successfully ran local tests

@apoelstra apoelstra merged commit 1101a79 into rust-bitcoin:master Mar 2, 2025
28 of 30 checks passed
@brunoerg brunoerg deleted the 2025-02-fuzz-miniscript-tap branch March 2, 2025 19:39
heap-coder added a commit to heap-coder/rust-miniscript that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2025
…t parsing from script

f96bf2472f52bd2461671afd8498f1ab27ead53f fuzz: add target for tapscript parsing from script (Bruno Garcia)

Pull request description:

  This PR adds a new fuzz target to parse a miniscript from script hex for Tap. We currently have one target that does it for Segwitv0.

ACKs for top commit:
  apoelstra:
    ACK f96bf2472f52bd2461671afd8498f1ab27ead53f; successfully ran local tests

Tree-SHA512: 97f61c52b5c582a278264a00df0c8cd7b871012f845f1b28dfd6d5fd3fceccef82b13b27bfed2357c67edf6181b53731eb71a244b73dc6599e839aab2ce78ccf
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants