Skip to content

Conversation

ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

@ehuss ehuss commented Jun 30, 2025

New rules:

  • attributes.type-system.non_exhaustive.duplicates
  • attributes.type-system.non_exhaustive.enum-exhaustiveness
  • attributes.type-system.non_exhaustive.enum-cast
  • attributes.type-system.non_exhaustive.inhabited

Renamed rules:

  • attributes.type-system.non_exhaustive.external-crate moved to .intro because it is generally explaining the purpose.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: The marked PR is awaiting review from a maintainer label Jun 30, 2025
@rustbot

This comment has been minimized.

This adds a rule name that was missing for this statement. It also
clarifies why this is being said.
This statement isn't really a rule, but more of a high-level
explanation. I have moved it to the intro where I think it better
belongs.
Some word cleanup and a hidden clarification.
The original felt a little awkward with how it differentiated between
enum and enum variants. I also wasn't terribly happy with using a list
here.
This adds a missing rule for this paragraph. It also adds a little more
clarity as to what it means.
The existing rule was mixing pattern match restrictions with match arm
exhaustiveness. Although very closely related, I think they deserve to
be split up.

This also adds a little clarity about tuple matching.
`type` is a keyword and can't be used here.
Single-segment identifiers are bindings and don't work to match
against a Unit struct.
The intent here is to highlight exactly where the errors are in the
example (and which ones aren't errors!).
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 29, 2025

This PR was rebased onto a different master commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed.

Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-review Status: The marked PR is awaiting review from a maintainer

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants