Skip to content

docs: fix incorrect stability markers on std::{todo, matches} #140351

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

This regression appeared in 916cfbc. The change is behaving as expected (a non-glob re-export uses the stability marker on the use item, not the original one), but this part of the standard library didn't follow it.

Fixes #140344

This regression appeared in 916cfbc.
The change is behaving as expected (a non-glob re-export uses the
stability marker on the `use` item, not the original one), but
this part of the standard library didn't follow it.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 26, 2025

r? @thomcc

rustbot has assigned @thomcc.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Wrong stabilization version for std::matches! since v1.86
3 participants