Skip to content

Conversation

workingjubilee
Copy link
Member

@workingjubilee workingjubilee commented Jun 11, 2025

This is to give us more time to discuss #142330 without the ecosystem having an anxiety attack. I have withdrawn unsupported_calling_conventions from report-in-deps

I believe we should consider this a simple suspension of the decision in #141435 to start this process, rather than a reversal. That is, we may continue with linting again. But I believe we are about to get a... reasonable amount of feedback just from currently available information and should allow ourselves time to process it.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 11, 2025

r? @fee1-dead

rustbot has assigned @fee1-dead.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 11, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 11, 2025

These commits modify compiler targets.
(See the Target Tier Policy.)

@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member Author

cc @RalfJung

@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member Author

oh I should bless tests, sec...

@@ -95,8 +95,7 @@ impl AbiMap {
return AbiMapping::Invalid;
}

(ExternAbi::Cdecl { .. }, Arch::X86) => CanonAbi::C,
(ExternAbi::Cdecl { .. }, _) => return AbiMapping::Deprecated(CanonAbi::C),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this should remain deprecated. Just disabling report_in_deps is enough IMO.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Alright.

@workingjubilee workingjubilee force-pushed the warn-less-about-cdecl-and-other-abis branch from 8c797db to 8f0c09a Compare June 11, 2025 16:58
@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

Thanks! r=me when CI is green.

@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r=RalfJung

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 11, 2025

📌 Commit 8f0c09a has been approved by RalfJung

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 11, 2025
workingjubilee added a commit to workingjubilee/rustc that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2025
…cl-and-other-abis, r=RalfJung

compiler: Ease off the accelerator on `unsupported_calling_conventions`

This is to give us more time to discuss rust-lang#142330 without the ecosystem having an anxiety attack. I have withdrawn `unsupported_calling_conventions` from report-in-deps

I believe we should consider this a simple suspension of the decision in rust-lang#141435 to start this process, rather than a reversal. That is, we may continue with linting again. But I believe we are about to get a... reasonable amount of feedback just from currently available information and should allow ourselves time to process it.
workingjubilee added a commit to workingjubilee/rustc that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2025
…cl-and-other-abis, r=RalfJung

compiler: Ease off the accelerator on `unsupported_calling_conventions`

This is to give us more time to discuss rust-lang#142330 without the ecosystem having an anxiety attack. I have withdrawn `unsupported_calling_conventions` from report-in-deps

I believe we should consider this a simple suspension of the decision in rust-lang#141435 to start this process, rather than a reversal. That is, we may continue with linting again. But I believe we are about to get a... reasonable amount of feedback just from currently available information and should allow ourselves time to process it.
@fee1-dead fee1-dead assigned RalfJung and unassigned fee1-dead Jun 12, 2025
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2025
…cl-and-other-abis, r=RalfJung

compiler: Ease off the accelerator on `unsupported_calling_conventions`

This is to give us more time to discuss rust-lang#142330 without the ecosystem having an anxiety attack. I have withdrawn `unsupported_calling_conventions` from report-in-deps

I believe we should consider this a simple suspension of the decision in rust-lang#141435 to start this process, rather than a reversal. That is, we may continue with linting again. But I believe we are about to get a... reasonable amount of feedback just from currently available information and should allow ourselves time to process it.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2025
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #138016 (Added `Clone` implementation for `ChunkBy`)
 - #140770 (add `extern "custom"` functions)
 - #141162 (refactor  `AttributeGate` and `rustc_attr!` to emit notes during feature checking)
 - #141474 (Add `ParseMode::Diagnostic` and fix multiline spans in diagnostic attribute lints)
 - #141947 (Specify that "option-like" enums must be `#[repr(Rust)]` to be ABI-compatible with their non-1ZST field.)
 - #142135 (docs: autogenerate compiler flag stubs based on -Zhelp)
 - #142252 (Improve clarity of `core::sync::atomic` docs about "Considerations" in regards to CAS operations)
 - #142337 (miri: add flag to suppress float non-determinism)
 - #142353 (compiler: Ease off the accelerator on `unsupported_calling_conventions`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2025
…cl-and-other-abis, r=RalfJung

compiler: Ease off the accelerator on `unsupported_calling_conventions`

This is to give us more time to discuss rust-lang#142330 without the ecosystem having an anxiety attack. I have withdrawn `unsupported_calling_conventions` from report-in-deps

I believe we should consider this a simple suspension of the decision in rust-lang#141435 to start this process, rather than a reversal. That is, we may continue with linting again. But I believe we are about to get a... reasonable amount of feedback just from currently available information and should allow ourselves time to process it.
@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

@bors p=1
since people are now seeing these warnings on their nightly builds and the playground

@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member Author

see #142433

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@workingjubilee workingjubilee added the CI-spurious-fail-npm we forgot to cache our installs from npm label Jun 12, 2025
@ChrisDenton ChrisDenton reopened this Jun 12, 2025
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@ChrisDenton
Copy link
Member

It looks like there is a genuine tidy error:

/checkout/tests/ui/linkage-attr/raw-dylib/windows/unsupported-abi.rs: revision [unspecified] should specify `needs-llvm-components:` as it has `--target` set

@bors r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jun 12, 2025
@ChrisDenton ChrisDenton force-pushed the warn-less-about-cdecl-and-other-abis branch from 5636649 to 5fdca31 Compare June 12, 2025 23:12
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@ChrisDenton ChrisDenton force-pushed the warn-less-about-cdecl-and-other-abis branch from 5fdca31 to 97c3860 Compare June 12, 2025 23:17
@ChrisDenton ChrisDenton force-pushed the warn-less-about-cdecl-and-other-abis branch from 97c3860 to 9f50246 Compare June 12, 2025 23:22
@ChrisDenton
Copy link
Member

I just applied the tidy suggestion and blessed. No other changes. We missed today's nightly but I really do want this to make the next one if it's at all possible.

@bors r=ChrisDenton,RalfJung p=2

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 12, 2025

📌 Commit 9f50246 has been approved by ChrisDenton,RalfJung

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jun 12, 2025
@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member Author

ah shit, I always forget the llvm components thing

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 13, 2025

⌛ Testing commit 9f50246 with merge ed44c0e...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 13, 2025

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: ChrisDenton,RalfJung
Pushing ed44c0e to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jun 13, 2025
@bors bors merged commit ed44c0e into rust-lang:master Jun 13, 2025
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.89.0 milestone Jun 13, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

What is this? This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing bb3a3c5 (parent) -> ed44c0e (this PR)

Test differences

Show 3 test diffs

Stage 1

  • [ui] tests/ui/linkage-attr/raw-dylib/windows/unsupported-abi.rs: ignore (only executed when the operating system is windows) -> pass (J2)

Stage 2

  • [ui] tests/ui/linkage-attr/raw-dylib/windows/unsupported-abi.rs: ignore (only executed when the operating system is windows) -> pass (J0)
  • [ui] tests/ui/linkage-attr/raw-dylib/windows/unsupported-abi.rs: ignore (only executed when the architecture is x86_64) -> pass (J1)

Job group index

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
    test-dashboard ed44c0e3b3a4f90c464361ec6892c1d42c15ea8f --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

  1. x86_64-apple-2: 3906.0s -> 4793.3s (22.7%)
  2. dist-aarch64-apple: 5101.4s -> 6038.3s (18.4%)
  3. dist-apple-various: 5999.0s -> 6953.1s (15.9%)
  4. i686-gnu-2: 5382.7s -> 6191.7s (15.0%)
  5. i686-gnu-nopt-1: 6956.3s -> 8001.6s (15.0%)
  6. x86_64-apple-1: 7365.6s -> 6424.0s (-12.8%)
  7. dist-x86_64-apple: 9724.6s -> 8564.2s (-11.9%)
  8. x86_64-gnu-debug: 5206.0s -> 5806.5s (11.5%)
  9. i686-gnu-1: 7181.9s -> 8002.1s (11.4%)
  10. armhf-gnu: 4471.3s -> 4979.7s (11.4%)
How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (ed44c0e): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary 1.4%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
8.5% [8.5%, 8.5%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-5.6% [-5.6%, -5.6%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results (primary 2.7%, secondary -2.3%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.7% [2.0%, 3.6%] 8
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.3% [-2.3%, -2.3%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) 2.7% [2.0%, 3.6%] 8

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 755.435s -> 756.165s (0.10%)
Artifact size: 372.24 MiB -> 372.25 MiB (0.00%)

@workingjubilee workingjubilee deleted the warn-less-about-cdecl-and-other-abis branch June 14, 2025 01:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-spurious Area: Spurious failures in builds (spuriously == for no apparent reason) CI-spurious-fail-npm we forgot to cache our installs from npm merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants