Sync from rust 2025/07/21 #740
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Most uses of it either contain a fat or thin lto module. Only WorkItem::LTO could contain both, but splitting that enum variant doesn't complicate things much.
…custom default data address space
Allow custom default address spaces and parse `p-` specifications in the datalayout string Some targets, such as CHERI, use as default an address space different from the "normal" default address space `0` (in the case of CHERI, [200 is used](https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/techreports/UCAM-CL-TR-877.pdf)). Currently, `rustc` does not allow to specify custom address spaces and does not take into consideration [`p-` specifications in the datalayout string](https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#langref-datalayout). This patch tries to mitigate these problems by allowing targets to define a custom default address space (while keeping the default value to address space `0`) and adding the code to parse the `p-` specifications in `rustc_abi`. The main changes are that `TargetDataLayout` now uses functions to refer to pointer-related informations, instead of having specific fields for the size and alignment of pointers in the default address space; furthermore, the two `pointer_size` and `pointer_align` fields in `TargetDataLayout` are replaced with an `FxHashMap` that holds info for all the possible address spaces, as parsed by the `p-` specifications. The potential performance drawbacks of not having ad-hoc fields for the default address space will be tested in this PR's CI run. r? workingjubilee
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#132469 (Do not suggest borrow that is already there in fully-qualified call) - rust-lang/rust#143340 (awhile -> a while where appropriate) - rust-lang/rust#143438 (Fix the link in `rustdoc.md`) - rust-lang/rust#143539 (Regression tests for repr ICEs) - rust-lang/rust#143566 (Fix `x86_64-unknown-netbsd` platform support page) - rust-lang/rust#143572 (Remove unused allow attrs) - rust-lang/rust#143583 (`loop_match`: fix 'no terminator on block') - rust-lang/rust#143584 (make `Machine::load_mir` infallible) - rust-lang/rust#143591 (Fix missing words in future tracking issue) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Remove support for dynamic allocas Followup to rust-lang/rust#141811
Various refactors to the LTO handling code In particular reducing the sharing of code paths between fat and thin-LTO and making the fat LTO implementation more self-contained. This also moves some autodiff handling out of cg_ssa into cg_llvm given that Enzyme only works with LLVM anyway and an implementation for another backend may do things entirely differently. This will also make it a bit easier to split LTO handling out of the coordinator thread main loop into a separate loop, which should reduce the complexity of the coordinator thread.
…errors fix `-Zsanitizer=kcfi` on `#[naked]` functions fixes rust-lang/rust#143266 With `-Zsanitizer=kcfi`, indirect calls happen via generated intermediate shim that forwards the call. The generated shim preserves the attributes of the original, including `#[unsafe(naked)]`. The shim is not a naked function though, and violates its invariants (like having a body that consists of a single `naked_asm!` call). My fix here is to match on the `InstanceKind`, and only use `codegen_naked_asm` when the instance is not a `ReifyShim`. That does beg the question whether there are other `InstanceKind`s that could come up. As far as I can tell the answer is no: calling via `dyn` seems to work find, and `#[track_caller]` is disallowed in combination with `#[naked]`. r? codegen ````@rustbot```` label +A-naked cc ````@maurer```` ````@rcvalle````
…update_cg_gcc_2025-07-18
antoyo
force-pushed
the
sync_from_rust_2025_07_21
branch
from
5e6d229 to
29ad3b1
Compare
antoyo
force-pushed
the
sync_from_rust_2025_07_21
branch
from
29ad3b1 to
c1be95c
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.