Skip to content

improvement(storybook): bump Storybook from 10.3.5 to 10.4.6#1143

Merged
bert-e merged 1 commit into
development/1.0from
improvement/bump-storybook-to-10.4.6
Jun 25, 2026
Merged

improvement(storybook): bump Storybook from 10.3.5 to 10.4.6#1143
bert-e merged 1 commit into
development/1.0from
improvement/bump-storybook-to-10.4.6

Conversation

@JeanMarcMilletScality

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What

Minor bump of Storybook within v10: 10.3.5 → 10.4.6.

Bumps the four lockstep packages:

  • storybook
  • @storybook/react-webpack5
  • @storybook/addon-docs
  • eslint-plugin-storybook

Why

Maintenance update that pulls in fixes directly relevant to core-ui's custom MDX docs:

  • Primary/Controls blocks now render in custom MDX pages (10.4.3)
  • Docs page no longer scroll-resets during HMR (10.4.3)
  • Partial globals overrides in story/meta annotations (10.4.6)

No .storybook/ config changes required. The larger 10.4 features (git-based change detection, AI setup, TanStack React, the experimental RCM docgen analyzer) are not adopted here — the RCM docgen swap is worth a separate spike.

Verification

  • npm install — clean, no peer/deprecation warnings
  • npm run build-storybook — completed successfully, no errors (only the pre-existing webpack bundle-size advisory)
  • All addon peer deps satisfied (@jbwatenbergscality/storybook-webmcp wants ^10.2.0; @chromatic-com/storybook supports through ^10.6)

Diff

Only package.json + package-lock.json.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Minor bump within v10 (storybook, @storybook/react-webpack5,
@storybook/addon-docs, eslint-plugin-storybook). Pulls in MDX/docs
bug fixes affecting custom MDX pages and HMR scroll behaviour.
Build verified via build-storybook.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@bert-e

bert-e commented Jun 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello jeanmarcmilletscality,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@bert-e

bert-e commented Jun 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

  • the author

  • one peer

Peer approvals must include at least 1 approval from the following list:

@JeanMarcMilletScality

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/approve

@bert-e

bert-e commented Jun 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Queue out of order

The changeset has received all authorizations to enter the merge queue,
however the merge queue is currently in an incoherent state. In order
to protect this pull request, I have not added the changeset to the
queue.

Look into https://devdocs.scality.net/support/faq/#bert-e for guidance about
what to do next to unlock the situation, or ask for help on the #ci-support
Slack channel.

The following options are set: approve

@JeanMarcMilletScality

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/status

@bert-e

bert-e commented Jun 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Status

Status report is not available.

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e

bert-e commented Jun 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

In the queue

The changeset has received all authorizations and has been added to the
relevant queue(s). The queue(s) will be merged in the target development
branch(es) as soon as builds have passed.

The changeset will be merged in:

  • ✔️ development/1.0

There is no action required on your side. You will be notified here once
the changeset has been merged. In the unlikely event that the changeset
fails permanently on the queue, a member of the admin team will
contact you to help resolve the matter.

IMPORTANT

Please do not attempt to modify this pull request.

  • Any commit you add on the source branch will trigger a new cycle after the
    current queue is merged.
  • Any commit you add on one of the integration branches will be lost.

If you need this pull request to be removed from the queue, please contact a
member of the admin team now.

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e

bert-e commented Jun 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
into targetted development branches:

  • ✔️ development/1.0

Please check the status of the associated issue None.

Goodbye jeanmarcmilletscality.

@bert-e bert-e merged commit 747dc00 into development/1.0 Jun 25, 2026
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants